Hi Megane,
thanks for looking at my submission. Let me try to answer your questions.
On Nov 17 2018, megane wrote:
Jörg F. Wittenberger writes:
Am 19.02.2016 um 22:39 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
...
I opened ticket 1259 for this.
To make the kind reviewers job easier, I'll post
Jörg F. Wittenberger writes:
> Am 19.02.2016 um 22:39 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
>> ...
>>> I opened ticket 1259 for this.
>>>
>>> To make the kind reviewers job easier, I'll post diffs in piecemeal here.
>
> This patch goes after killing a single - but important - comment line in
>
I can only repeat: the all-in-one change did not fly neither will the
piecemeal approach.
We need to come up with a small API atop of which users can switch
scheduler implementations.
Am 20.05.2016 um 21:26 schrieb Peter Bex:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:39:23PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger
Peter Bex scripsit:
> I'll have to think about this, maybe we can come up with a way to
> avoid paying the price on UNIX for the shit Windows implementation.
> Better would be to have a *proper* implementation on Windows, but
> nobody has stepped up to actually overhaul the entire code to make
>
Fixes for last patch.
Sorry, this had to happen sooner or later.
This patch just fixes use of outdates predicates.
Cheers
/Jörg
BTW: Interesting that this did work to some extend. (#1 reason to begin
with the timeout queue was that the original code still uses fixnum
timeouts for backward
Am 19.02.2016 um 22:39 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
> ...
>> I opened ticket 1259 for this.
>>
>> To make the kind reviewers job easier, I'll post diffs in piecemeal here.
This patch goes after killing a single - but important - comment line in
scheduler.scm:
;; This should really use a
The "Betthupferl"
Am 19.02.2016 um 18:46 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
> Am 19.02.2016 um 14:02 schrieb Jörg F. Wittenberger:
...
> I opened ticket 1259 for this.
>
> To make the kind reviewers job easier, I'll post diffs in piecemeal here.
A "Betthupferl" is Bavarian (a German dialect spoken
