Re: [Chicken-hackers] foof-loop ported to Chicken 4

2010-01-14 Thread Jim Ursetto
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Peter Danenberg wrote: > It always irritated me, by the way, that srfi-41 was called "streams" > (just like srfi-78 was call "check"); is it possible to alias it > somehow to srfi-41? Oh, I did not know of this naming bifurcation. That is confusing and explains w

Re: [Chicken-hackers] foof-loop ported to Chicken 4

2010-01-14 Thread Peter Danenberg
Quoth Mario Domenech Goulart on Prickle-Prickle, the 14th of Chaos: > It's done. Thanks, again, Mario for so promptly taking care of it. ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hacker

Re: [Chicken-hackers] foof-loop ported to Chicken 4

2010-01-14 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:32:05 -0600 Jim Ursetto wrote: > Mario should be able to give you commit access to this egg if you > would like. It's done. Thanks Peter and Jim. Best wishes. Mario ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org

Re: [Chicken-hackers] foof-loop ported to Chicken 4

2010-01-14 Thread Peter Danenberg
> Mario should be able to give you commit access to this egg if you > would like. That would be great; at least one of the tests appears to depend on srfi-40, for which I thought streams was an apt replacement (it's indexed by srfi-41). Apparently, though, I may not be able to avoid porting srfi-4

Re: [Chicken-hackers] foof-loop ported to Chicken 4

2010-01-14 Thread Jim Ursetto
Committed to SVN with two changes: disabled load of "streams" extension (which doesn't exist?) and compiled the code instead of installing source. Upon testing, these tests do not work: filter-map sieve vector-quick-sort! unzip5 concatenate. Mario should be able to give you commit access to this

Re: [Chicken-hackers] foof-loop ported to Chicken 4

2010-01-13 Thread Jim Ursetto
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Peter Danenberg wrote: > Thanks, Jim; I just realized that the bulk of the commit is whitespace > resulting from wrapping the code in a module. > > Let me know if you need me to clean it up. No, I can adjust the whitespace. FWIW, by convention, Chicken 4 eggs usu

Re: [Chicken-hackers] foof-loop ported to Chicken 4

2010-01-13 Thread Peter Danenberg
Thanks, Jim; I just realized that the bulk of the commit is whitespace resulting from wrapping the code in a module. Let me know if you need me to clean it up. Quoth Jim Ursetto on Pungenday, the 13rd of Chaos: > 2010/1/13 Peter Danenberg : > > I ported foof-loop to Chicken 4 and added a test sui

Re: [Chicken-hackers] foof-loop ported to Chicken 4

2010-01-13 Thread Jim Ursetto
2010/1/13 Peter Danenberg : > I ported foof-loop to Chicken 4 and added a test suite based on > foof-loop.txt[1] I'll take a look at this and commit it for you. Jim ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mai