Hi Jim,
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 02:56:52 -0600 Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 00:51, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
Mario,
My guess is that you did
make -j2 spotless all
which causes some of the rm's from spotless to overlap the beginning of the
Mario,
My guess is that you did
make -j2 spotless all
which causes some of the rm's from spotless to overlap the beginning of the
build. I am curious if it is possible to avoid this, but for now, my advice
would be: don't do that ;). Issue two calls to make instead.
Jim
On Mar 4, 2011, at
Hi Jim,
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:36:20 -0600 Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 01:38, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
Spoke too soon :(. I had 5 or 6 successful builds on two machines but
1 failure on a different machine (at -j4).
If anyone wants to be a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
felix winkelmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Kon Lovett klov...@pacbell.net wrote:
Yes, there is a missing dependency. I noticed it when working on setup-api
but never bothered to look into it. Just typed �'!!ret'.
Please do not
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Kon Lovett klov...@pacbell.net wrote:
Yes, there is a missing dependency. I noticed it when working on setup-api
but never bothered to look into it. Just typed '!!ret'.
Please do not change the dependencies lightheartedly. The dependency chain
is somewhat
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:08 AM, felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com wrote:
Please do not change the dependencies lightheartedly. The dependency chain
is somewhat subtle - the compilation of the setup modules happens in a tricky
situation: the import-library of setup-api is required for
Easily. As you might expect, its an uncommon occurrence.
But before masking -jN at distro level, one informs upstream of the problem :)
Cheers,
Leo
2009/4/14 Shawn Rutledge shawn.t.rutle...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:08 AM, felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com wrote:
Please do not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I got a report today that chicken-4.0.0 fails and that it is probably a parallel
build failure[1]. I just reproduced the failure by increasing the number of jobs
that make runs with. The failure on my machine is reproduced below. A full build
log
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
hk...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I got a report today that chicken-4.0.0 fails and that it is probably a
parallel
build failure[1]. I just reproduced the failure by increasing the number of
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, felix winkelmann wrote:
snip
Don't use parallel builds.
heh, this made my morning. thanks :)
-elf
___
Chicken-hackers mailing list
Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
On Apr 13, 2009, at 11:00 AM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 6:00 AM, felix winkelmann
bunny...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
I got a report today that chicken-4.0.0 fails and that it is
probably a parallel
build failure[1].
11 matches
Mail list logo
