Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Release candidate for 2.6 available

2007-02-26 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:29:20 -0800 Brandon J. Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Builds and installs fine under MSVC. Haven't really tested the functionality though. It always pings my lazy-o-meter, the lack of tests. Are there some simple tests we could agree on to validate the build?

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Release candidate for 2.6 available

2007-02-26 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On 26 Feb 2007 15:53:25 -0300 Mario Domenech Goulart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:29:20 -0800 Brandon J. Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Builds and installs fine under MSVC. Haven't really tested the functionality though. It always pings my lazy-o-meter, the lack

Re: [Chicken-hackers] new release policy

2007-09-03 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Felix and folks, On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 19:28:37 +0200 felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The chicken version has been bumped to 2.701, now. There will be no more official releases from now on, just continuously created snapshots. Mario's automated snapshot builds can be considered

Re: [Chicken-hackers] RFC : How to make a Debian package for a chicken egg?

2007-09-12 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Nelson, On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:02:18 -0500 Nelson Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, there was a request for Debian packages for Svnwiki in a list about Debian in Colombia[1]. I would like to try to create the packages (basically because nobody else seems to be willing to do it :) ).

[Chicken-hackers] Custom salmonella results feeds

2007-10-04 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi folks, As suggested by Hans Bulfone, I've implemented a way for egg authors to create custom salmonella results feeds. So, if you want to create a feed containing the salmonella results for the eggs you want to monitor (e.g., all your eggs), add a file to svn repo dir/salmonella-custom-feeds

[Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Error When Installing Numbers Egg

2007-10-08 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Zbigniew, On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 21:45:40 -0500 Zbigniew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Mario. Did this happen when the egg was checked out from SVN by the automated build process? My copy did not show any issues. I guess it was my mistake. IIRC, I manually uploaded the egg with

Re: [Chicken-hackers] multiple issues in embedded PCRE

2007-11-21 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Marijn, On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:44:48 +0100 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kon Lovett wrote: chicken ships its own copy of libpcre which has multiple vulnerabilities http://secunia.com/advisories/27543/. Chicken ships w/ PCRE 7.4 No it doesn't. There are some

Re: [Chicken-hackers] multiple issues in embedded PCRE

2007-11-21 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi folks, On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:47:09 -0500 John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marijn Schouten (hkBst) scripsit: I don't fully understand. You're saying the current snapshot of the stable release is useless except for bootstrapping? Does this have anything to do with egg versioning or

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: [Chicken-hackers] multiple issues in embedded PCRE

2007-11-22 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi John and folks, On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:04:41 -0500 John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Domenech Goulart scripsit: Stable releases = http://chicken.wiki.br/releases These may be stable in the sense that the bits in them, exept for the most recent instance, don't change

Re: [Chicken-hackers] multiple issues in embedded PCRE

2007-11-23 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:19:44 -0500 John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mario Domenech Goulart scripsit: Anyway, maybe that's just a slightly different view of the stable word. The fact is that we have a release tarball (supposedly bug free; given a version number, the code doesn't

Re: [Chicken-hackers] multiple issues in embedded PCRE

2007-11-23 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Marijn, On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:38:48 +0100 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: felix winkelmann wrote: How do you invoke make? There is a src_compile function in ebuilds and for chicken I use: src_compile() { OPTIONS=PLATFORM=linux PREFIX=/usr make

Re: [Chicken-hackers] multiple issues in embedded PCRE

2007-11-26 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Marijn, Sorry for the late response. Comments bellow. On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:44:48 +0100 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: echo #define C_HACKED_APPLY chicken-config.h cat chicken-defaults.h chicken-config.h gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -DHAVE_CHICKEN_CONFIG_H

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Egg filename versioning

2008-02-07 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Leonardo, On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:03:37 +0100 Leonardo Valeri Manera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We (the gentoo scheme people) would like to provide eggs via our packaging system. There are various reasons for this, among which standardizing location - we have inbuilt safeguards against

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Egg filename versioning

2008-02-07 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On 07 Feb 2008 12:17:39 -0200 Mario Domenech Goulart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:03:37 +0100 Leonardo Valeri Manera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We (the gentoo scheme people) would like to provide eggs via our packaging system. There are various reasons

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: repository branching

2008-02-26 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi folks, On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:55:22 +0100 felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:17 AM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, actually it can be argued that the releases/N change does make it possible for new features to start showing up

Re: [Chicken-hackers] chicken hackers guide

2008-03-06 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:03:59 +0100 felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At http://chicken.wiki.br/chicken-hackers-guide you'll find a pathetic little document listing some notes that might be of interest for core developers. Just a few handy tips, really. I hope to add more there in the

[Chicken-hackers] required-extension-version (possible version-numbers issue)

2008-04-14 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi folks, Here's what I get when trying to install http: $ /usr/local/chicken-3.1.3/bin/chicken-setup http (many messages ommited) downloading uri.egg from (www.call-with-current-continuation.org eggs/3 80) ... gzip -d -c /tmp/chicken-setup-3-mario/downloads/uri.egg | tar xf - Error: the

Re: [Chicken-hackers] required-extension-version (possible version-numbers issue)

2008-04-14 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Ivan, On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:24:56 +0900 Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do you propose this is handled? The situation below occurs because 501 6 (obviously), so chicken-setup thinks that 1.501 is newer than 1.6.x. My solution would be to remove releases and prerequisites of

[Chicken-hackers] Default trace buffer size

2008-08-11 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi guys, The documentation for -:aNUMBER (http://chicken.wiki.br/Using%20the%20compiler#runtime-options) says the default trace buffer size is 16, but runtime.c defines it as 8: #define DEFAULT_TRACE_BUFFER_SIZE 8 Should I update the docs? Best wishes, Mario

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Default trace buffer size

2008-08-11 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:46:26 -0500 Jim Ursetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Mario Domenech Goulart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The documentation for -:aNUMBER (http://chicken.wiki.br/Using%20the%20compiler#runtime-options) says the default trace buffer size

Re: [Chicken-hackers] New home for salmonella

2008-10-15 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Peter On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:11:45 +0200 Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:11:53AM -0300, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: Hi guys I've moved salmonella to a new, faster, machine. Besides running salmonella faster, it alleviates galinha's load. The new

[Chicken-hackers] New home for salmonella

2008-10-15 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi guys I've moved salmonella to a new, faster, machine. Besides running salmonella faster, it alleviates galinha's load. The new salmonella home is http://salmonella.ucpel.tche.br Please, update your bookmarks and the address of your atom feeds (in case you use them). Best wishes. Mario

[Chicken-hackers] Unit files for chicken 3.4.0 (was Re: [Chicken-users] Srfi-19 problems)

2008-11-07 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi folks. On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:19:36 -0800 Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 6, 2008, at 7:56 PM, Timothy Beyer wrote: The files unit came into existence with Chicken 3.4.0 (you are using 3.3.0 I see). I suggest creating a empty extension files so 'require' doesn't barf, upgrading

[Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 4 development snapshots

2009-06-28 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:30:36 +0900 Ivan Raikov ivan.g.rai...@gmail.com wrote: The Chicken development snapshot script has been adapted to Chicken 4. From now on, Chicken 4 snapshots will be built and linked to on the development snapshots page: http://chicken.wiki.br/dev-snapshots/

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Release files checksum mismatch

2009-08-11 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Peter On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:16:31 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: I've finally made a Chicken 4.1.0 package for pkgsrc. This package uses www.call-with-current-continuation.org/chicken-4.1.0.tar.gz but also chicken.wiki.br/releases/4.1.0/chicken-4.1.0.tar.gz as a mirror.

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: [Chicken-users] single-stepping

2009-12-15 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Derrell On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:13:19 -0500 Derrell Piper d...@electric-loft.org wrote: The main page also needs to be updated to reflect the move from svn to git. (I've asked for a Trac account...) I've just updated the page. Thanks for reporting this. Don't get me wrong. I very much

Re: [Chicken-hackers] foof-loop ported to Chicken 4

2010-01-14 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:32:05 -0600 Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote: Mario should be able to give you commit access to this egg if you would like. It's done. Thanks Peter and Jim. Best wishes. Mario ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list

[Chicken-hackers] Manual updates

2010-04-06 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi chicken hackers Currently we have git and svn repos which contain the manual source: one for the current version (svn) and the other for the next version (git). Is it safe to modify the wiki manual without providing patches to be applied to git? I think so, but decided to ask, just in case.

Re: [Chicken-hackers] svnsync for egg mirrors

2010-08-12 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Alaric On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 11:24:02 +0100 Alaric Snell-Pym ala...@snell-pym.org.uk wrote: Mario... I'm pointing http://chicken.kitten-technologies.co.uk/svn/ at the svnsync mirror; please kill the cronjob whenever you're ready :-) Killed! If it all works, I'll write up a How to set up

Re: [Chicken-hackers] FroSCon 2010 - It's been great!

2010-08-25 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:12:52 +0200 Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org wrote: Pictures of this event can be seen at http://www.call-cc.org/froscon-2010/ once the upload is done. (As you can see I suck at taking pictures.) See http://www.call-cc.org/pictures/froscon-2010/ (my fault,

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Darcs' experiences with the software freedom conservancy

2010-09-03 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:07:12 -0400 (EDT) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: From: Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org Subject: [Chicken-hackers] Darcs' experiences with the software freedom conservancy Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:09:03 +0200 as part of my

Re: [Chicken-hackers] something equal? to EQUALP

2010-09-07 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi John and folks On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 09:05:59 -0400 John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org wrote: Felix scripsit: Any ideas for a better name? Any considerations that should be taken into account? How about structurally-equal? A little long, but very clear. I'm not sure. When I read

[Chicken-hackers] umask

2010-11-01 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi I haven't found anything related to umask(2) in unit posix or in eggs. Do we have something? In case we don't, should it be added to unit posix? Or to an egg? Best wishes. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list

Re: [Chicken-hackers] umask

2010-11-01 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 18:54:43 +0100 Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org wrote: * Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com [101101 18:40]: I haven't found anything related to umask(2) in unit posix or in eggs. Do we have something? In case we don't, should it be added to unit

[Chicken-hackers] [CR] umask support

2010-11-03 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi As suggested by Christian, I've created a ticket for trying the CR proposal (http://wiki.call-cc.org/cr-proposal). The CR is http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/424 Best wishes. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list

[Chicken-hackers] Re: [CR] umask support

2010-11-22 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 08:37:48 -0400 Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com wrote: As suggested by Christian, I've created a ticket for trying the CR proposal (http://wiki.call-cc.org/cr-proposal). The CR is http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/424 We have some open questions regarding

[Chicken-hackers] Poll on umask support (#424)

2010-11-30 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi A poll on the umask support has been set. See http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/424#comment:13 The mentioned patch is http://bugs.call-cc.org/attachment/ticket/424/file-creation-mode.diff, which implements `file-creation-mode' and a setter for it. Best wishes. Mario --

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Poll on umask support (#424)

2010-12-01 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Thomas, On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 15:44:03 +0100 Thomas Chust ch...@web.de wrote: 2010/12/1 Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com: On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 13:50:33 +0100 Thomas Chust ch...@web.de wrote: [...] my apologies for the stupid question, but how does one vote in the poll? I don't

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Remove of egg version from subversion query

2010-12-16 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Kon, On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:00:19 -0800 Kon Lovett klov...@mac.com wrote: Does anyone see a problem with deleting an egg version from the Subversion repository? Specifically uuid-ossp/tags/1.22. I do not want to continue this mistaken versioning style. If the versioning style is wrong, I

[Chicken-hackers] Attention to removed procedures/type specifier

2011-02-18 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi egg authors, Could you please take a look at the following tickets to check if your eggs are using deprecated (removed from 4.6.5) procedures/type specifier? * `pointer' type specifier: http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/507 Affects: * fastcgi * hostinfo * ncurses * udp * xosd *

Re: [Chicken-hackers] parallel build failure

2011-03-04 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Jim, On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:36:20 -0600 Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 01:38, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote: Spoke too soon :(.  I had 5 or 6 successful builds on two machines but 1 failure on a different machine (at -j4). If anyone wants to be a

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Cannot access egg svn repo

2011-03-09 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Kon, On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:21:44 -0800 Kon Lovett konlov...@gmail.com wrote: Has something changed? I now see svn: access to 'https://code.call-cc.org/svn/chicken-eggs' forbidden when attempting a svn co https://code.call-cc.org/svn/chicken-eggs (I get the same response

Re: [Chicken-hackers] parallel build failure

2011-03-09 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Jim, On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 02:56:52 -0600 Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 00:51, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote: Mario, My guess is that you did  make -j2 spotless all which causes some of the rm's from spotless to overlap the beginning of the

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Cannot access egg svn repo

2011-03-09 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi guys, On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 23:40:52 +0100 Thomas Chust ch...@web.de wrote: 2011/3/7 Kon Lovett konlov...@gmail.com: [...] Has something changed? I now see        svn: access to 'https://code.call-cc.org/svn/chicken-eggs' forbidden not that it is of any help, but I have been seeing the

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal

2011-03-15 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi John, On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:12:06 -0400 John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com wrote: 1. *Lower Barriers to Entry*. My guess is that the absolute easiest way for potential contributors to contribute a package is to simply ask them to upload a tar.gz archive of their project. Supply them with a

[Chicken-hackers] -O3 and -unboxing

2011-07-04 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, The docs (http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/4/Using%20the%20compiler) state that: -optimize-level 3 is equivalent to -optimize-leaf-routines -local -inline -inline-global -unboxing And that -unboxing try to use unboxed temporaries for numerical operations. This optimization is only

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Problem compiling git snapshots

2011-07-26 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Jules, On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:26:13 + (UTC) esp2...@comcast.net wrote: In the last few days, compiling git snapshots of Master, et. al., has failed after invoking identify.sh; gcc emits errors about not finding files: buildid, buildbranch, and buildtag.h . Seems identify.sh is trying

Re: [Chicken-hackers] gcc compile farm

2011-08-03 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Felix, On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 23:49:55 +0200 (CEST) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: I registered at the GCC Compile Farm: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm Contact me if you're interested in getting chicken-stuff tested on one of their machines. That's very

Re: [Chicken-hackers] gcc compile farm

2011-08-10 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Felix, On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 01:58:20 -0400 (EDT) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: From: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] gcc compile farm Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:37:53 -0400 On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 08:54:26 +0200 (CEST

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] C_TARGET_INCLUDE_HOME fix for cygwin

2011-09-13 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, Attached is a patch to fix C_TARGET_INCLUDE_HOME for cygwin. Best wishes. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario From e6211ff140bfd8d3bebc25458d94b9e51e9e7424 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:27:52 -0300 Subject: [PATCH

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] sequence type corrections and enhancements

2011-09-14 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 04:25:11 -0400 (EDT) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: From: Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] sequence type corrections and enhancements Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 03:52:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter Bex

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix typo in man page and place dot on its own line to satisfy mandoc

2011-09-14 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
in man page and place dot on its own line to satisfy mandoc Signed-off-by: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com --- chicken.1 |5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/chicken.1 b/chicken.1 index 20fa068..86a2e6e 100644 --- a/chicken.1 +++ b/chicken.1

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Copy cygchicken-0.dll to the tests dir on cygwin (for make check)

2011-09-14 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
From aae5fd5e6b3bbd8981cde72b8e47c11548efa82c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 21:11:00 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] Copy cygchicken-0.dll to the tests dir on cygwin (for make check) --- tests/runtests.sh |5 + 1 files changed

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] testclean: remove tests/*.dll (for windows systems)

2011-09-14 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
From be712785ca1aa127c85715ec5c2c8fda7eebc987 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 21:57:52 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] testclean: remove tests/*.dll (for windows systems) On windows systems either cygchicken-0.dll or libchicken.dll

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Copy cygchicken-0.dll to the tests dir on cygwin (for make check)

2011-09-15 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, Please, ignore this patch. It probably breaks mingw-msys, since msys' `uname' doesn't have to `-o'options. I'm gonna fix it and submit it again. Best wishes. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run test suite on mingw

2011-10-28 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Felix, On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:07:22 -0400 (EDT) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: From: Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org Subject: [PATCH] run test suite on mingw Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 03:40:57 -0400 (EDT) The attached patch adds a batch file for

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run test suite on mingw

2011-10-28 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Felix, On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:00:31 -0400 (EDT) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: From: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run test suite on mingw Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 06:12:18 -0400 On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:07:22

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] run test suite on mingw

2011-10-28 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario From 4ad7c8ecc801c15a842698f7fd2200ea4cfdad5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 22:58:32 -0200 Subject: [PATCH] README: note about use of back slashes for CHICKEN on windows/mingw --- README

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle runaway union types in scrutinizer

2011-11-01 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Felix, On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:43:45 +0100 (CET) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: From: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle runaway union types in scrutinizer Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:05:43 -0400 On Mon, 31

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle runaway union types in scrutinizer

2011-11-01 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:31:36 -0400 Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:43:45 +0100 (CET) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: From: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] handle runaway

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Remove scripts/make-egg-rss-feed.scm (imported into the chicken-infrastructure repo)

2011-11-11 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, I've moved scripts/make-egg-rss-feed.scm to the chicken-infrastructure repo (just like make-egg-index.scm has been once moved). Best wishes. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario From bce94ce6b1812c574bd54652a21c377a03cd16a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Remove scripts/make-egg-rss-feed.scm (imported into the chicken-infrastructure repo)

2011-11-11 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:32:28 +0100 Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org wrote: * Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com [11 13:20]: I've moved scripts/make-egg-rss-feed.scm to the chicken-infrastructure repo (just like make-egg-index.scm has been once moved). Sounds like

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] scripts/tools.scm: needs regex for `string-match'

2011-11-16 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Christian, On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 10:08:41 +0100 Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org wrote: As for the commit I think it would be cleaner to convert *all* the dependencies on regex to irregex, as Mario pointed out that the scripts using tools.scm all also depend on regex. Mario, have

Re: [Chicken-hackers] dev. snapshot

2012-02-07 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Felix, On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:02:08 +0100 (CET) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: I tagged a new version, but no dev. snapshot seems to be generated. According to /home/chicken/log/dev-snapshot.log (is this the right file?) Yes, that's the right one. making the

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [patch] disallow slashes in egg names, ignore . and ..

2012-02-24 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi John, On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:46:22 -0500 John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org wrote: Personally I'd go with a-z, A-Z (only used by 9ML-toolkit, F-operator, and miniML), 0-9, and hyphen only. We have hfs+ (http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/4/hfs%2B) Best wishes. Mario --

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] deprecate make syntax

2012-02-27 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Felix, On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:16:06 +0100 (CET) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: The attached patch deprecates the make macro from the setup-api module. There is a make egg that has the same functionality, so there is no need to duplicate it here in the core system.

[Chicken-hackers] ugarit and tuples start breaking on 2012/03/03

2012-03-05 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, Something changed in the core that makes ugarit and tuples break on 2012/03/04. They were not breaking the day before. You can see the salmonella diff here: http://tests.call-cc.org/master/linux/x86/2012/03/04/yesterday-diff/ The installation error messages for ugarit and tuples are here:

Re: [Chicken-hackers] ugarit and tuples start breaking on 2012/03/03

2012-03-06 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Christian, On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 17:50:42 +0100 Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org wrote: * Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com [120305 21:43]: Regarding the other eggs that can be seen in the diff: skiplists breaks because it depends on tuples. endian-port failed because

Re: [Chicken-hackers] ugarit and tuples start breaking on 2012/03/03

2012-03-12 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:42:27 -0500 Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com wrote: Something changed in the core that makes ugarit and tuples break on 2012/03/04. They were not breaking the day before. You can see the salmonella diff here: http://tests.call-cc.org/master/linux/x86

Re: [Chicken-hackers] What's left for the next release?

2012-04-16 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:36:41 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:20:36AM +0200, Christian Kellermann wrote: since I will be able to hack more on chicken again on the next weekends I would like to focus my energy on clearing the way for a new release.

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] When referencing libchicken, take PROGRAM_PREFIX into account

2012-05-16 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
tests on windows. Best wishes. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario From 6834c22e77cb8cf923debc896092c89481fbab41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mario Domenech Goulart ma...@ossystems.com.br Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 17:11:54 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] When referencing libchicken, take PROGRAM_PREFIX

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] When referencing libchicken, take PROGRAM_PREFIX into account

2012-05-17 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, Thanks for looking at that, Peter. Some comments below. On Thu, 17 May 2012 13:41:19 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 02:12:30PM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: Currently, the build system names libchicken taking PROGRAM_PREFIX into account

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] When referencing libchicken, take PROGRAM_PREFIX into account

2012-05-17 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Thu, 17 May 2012 14:38:28 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 08:27:47AM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: On Thu, 17 May 2012 13:41:19 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: PS: The README mentions a wiki page that does not exist (anymore): http

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] When referencing libchicken, take PROGRAM_PREFIX into account

2012-05-17 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Thu, 17 May 2012 08:27:47 -0400 Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for looking at that, Peter. Some comments below. On Thu, 17 May 2012 13:41:19 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 02:12:30PM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Check all elements of the list for being a string in make-pathname

2012-05-24 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Christian, On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:15:58 +0200 Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org wrote: The diff below fixes the bug methinks. Thanks for looking into it. Wouldn't diff --git a/files.scm b/files.scm index 3fae8f5..5c00875 100644 --- a/files.scm +++ b/files.scm @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Check all elements of the list for being a string in make-pathname

2012-05-24 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Thu, 24 May 2012 13:59:07 -0400 Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:43:02 +0200 Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org wrote: * Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com [120524 19:37]: On Thu, 24 May 2012 19:15:58 +0200 Christian

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] ensure scrutiny doesn't walk nodes more than once

2012-05-30 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Felix, On Wed, 30 May 2012 22:15:22 +0200 (CEST) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: The attached patch fixes a problem with the scrutinizer which causes nodes to be walked more than once. A case detected by Christian and Mario turned out that this behaviour (which is

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] ensure scrutiny doesn't walk nodes more than once

2012-05-31 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, On Thu, 31 May 2012 08:55:16 +0200 Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org wrote: * Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com [120531 05:09]: Thanks for your patch. Yes! Many Thanks Felix! So, as far as I can tell, your patch doesn't break anything. If nobody has objections

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Change setjmp/longjmp to _setjmp/_longjmp to avoid overhead and fix signal masking bug

2012-06-13 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:22:02 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: I've also attached two outputs from the resurrected Chicken benchmarks by Mario: https://github.com/mario-goulart/chicken-benchmarks These clearly show about a 5% speed improvement across the board. (you can see a

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Change setjmp/longjmp to _setjmp/_longjmp to avoid overhead and fix signal masking bug

2012-06-13 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Peter, On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:22:02 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: I've also attached two outputs from the resurrected Chicken benchmarks by Mario: https://github.com/mario-goulart/chicken-benchmarks These clearly show about a 5% speed improvement across the board. (you can

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] #870: SRFI-13's string comparison procedures return integers

2012-06-20 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:11:23 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:09:25PM -0500, Jim Ursetto wrote: Attached patch fixes ticket #870. Shouldn't there be regression tests for this? I know mario created a repo with tests for srfi-13 and srfi-1.

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] #870: SRFI-13's string comparison procedures return integers

2012-06-20 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:11:23 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 07:09:25PM -0500, Jim Ursetto wrote: Attached patch fixes ticket #870. Shouldn't there be regression tests for this? I know mario created a repo with tests for srfi-13 and srfi-1. Personally I

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] #870: SRFI-13's string comparison procedures return integers

2012-06-20 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:07:52 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:07:32AM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: Regardless of the [in]existence of in-core tests for SRFI-13, I think the patch is ok and actually improves things by fixing some bugs. I'd like

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Avoid using / in xsubstring and string-xcopy!, since srfi-13 is compiled with (declare (fixnum))

2012-06-28 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
removes that shorter path, so the fixnum declaration can be kept. Best wishes. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario From 63ef97fabd1e5f3a908195748935a1ed69fc46bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:46:03 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] Avoid

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Chicken-users] [SECURITY] Buffer overrun vulnerability in Chicken's scheduler

2012-06-29 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:40:46 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:33:28PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: Currently a patch is being developed. In the meanwhile an effective workaround is to limit the maximum number of open descriptors using the Unix ulimit -n

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Avoid using / in xsubstring and string-xcopy!, since srfi-13 is compiled with (declare (fixnum))

2012-06-29 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 20:49:49 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:25:11AM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: The attached patch contains a fix to #869 (https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/869). srfi-13.scm is compiled with (declare (fixnum)), but `xsubstring

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add tests for SRFI-13 (adapted from Gauche)

2012-06-29 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, Attached are some tests for the srfi-13 unit. Best wishes, Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario From 9b090d353e4c3f3c0c60eac39ba1612fde3bce22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 20:24:19 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] Add tests

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] copy-propagation breaks beta-contraction invariant

2012-07-06 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 08:57:04 +0200 (CEST) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: Copy propagation of local procedure names may re-introduce references to contracted procedures, and thus breaks the invariant that contracted procedures are only referenced once. With certain code

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add tests for SRFI-14

2012-07-07 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 15:39:29 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] Add tests for SRFI-14 Tests by Olin Shivers for the SRFI-14 reference implementation (http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-14/srfi-14-tests.scm). Those tests triggered a compiler bug (http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix bad call in chicken-install error situation

2012-07-19 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
:44:58PM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: Shouldn't `with-default-sources' give something like (lambda () (with-output-to-port (current-error-port) (lambda () (print Could not determine a source of extensions. Please, specify

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] csc.scm: properly handle -output-file

2012-08-22 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, The attached patch fixes #903 (csc ignores -output-file). See http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/903 Best wishes. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario From 35e8e63ee3a30becfdc7e6351ea5e358d4013ad3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 22 Aug

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] csc.scm: properly handle -output-file

2012-08-23 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Felix, On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:18:25 +0200 (CEST) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: From: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com Subject: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] csc.scm: properly handle -output-file Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:00:49 -0400 The attached patch

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] signal-tests can hang when port is already in use

2012-08-27 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:52:49 +0200 (CEST) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: The attached patch fixes a problem that caused the tests to hang in the salmonella runs. The signal-test forks a child process that waits for a tcp message before it terminates. If the port is in

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #905

2012-08-29 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:21:39 +0200 (CEST) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl Subject: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix for #905 Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:04:37 +0200 As Ivan found out the hard way, I forgot to modify hash-table-copy

[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] chicken.h: define C_noret as __attribute__ ((noreturn)) for clang too

2012-09-06 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
to postpone it to after 4.8.0. Best wishes. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario From 3710897303dbb2e7c2e198f3aefa1ee5f11a0164 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 22:10:42 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] chicken.h: define C_noret

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] chicken.h: define C_noret as __attribute__ ((noreturn)) for clang too

2012-09-07 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:30:03 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 09:18:38PM -0400, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: Christian Lask reported on #chicken that make check fails when Chicken is built with clang (see #917). The attached patch seems to fix

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for deprecated declaration

2012-09-08 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 14:06:28 +0200 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 11:51:14PM +0200, Felix wrote: The attached patch fixes a bug reported by Christian. The type-validation of deprecated type-specifiers returned an incorrect value. Also, a small bug in the

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] bug in type-validation for deprecated declaration

2012-09-08 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Felix, On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 23:09:42 +0200 (CEST) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: I can not reproduce this, and only can test on a PPC64 (gcc compile farm). This bug looks a bit obscure. I can't either on NetBSD/macppc, but AFAIK Mario can reproduce it reliably.

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [co...@mercury.ccil.org: Re: 4.8.0 release?]

2012-09-08 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi John, On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:35:06 -0400 John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org wrote: Mario Domenech Goulart scripsit: If I understand correctly, you tried the git code (since you had to bootstrap) not the rc tarball, right? Not that this is a problem (not at all) -- it's just to understand

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Cygwin issues

2012-09-08 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 16:38:44 -0400 John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org wrote: Peter Bex scripsit: I haven't filed a bug, but the Cygwin test failures are ominous. Yeah, that's rather worrying. I think this needs to be addressed before making a release, unless we intend to drop support

  1   2   3   4   >