Re: [Chicken-users] callbacks without having a C_toplevel()

2005-08-29 Thread Daniel B. Faken
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, felix winkelmann wrote: > On 8/25/05, Daniel B. Faken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > My question: what is the *appropriate* way to go about this? > > Or, what is the minimum "boilerplate" required for a C_toplevel() > > which just calls (return-to-host)? > > - comp

Re: [Chicken-users] Problem with static compile

2005-08-29 Thread felix winkelmann
On 8/28/05, Eric Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Felix, > > Thanks for the quick response, I still have a few questions, > however, I can wait a few days. I expect that the example will > probably answer most of my questions. Don't put yourself out to much > though. I only worked on this p

Re: [Chicken-users] callbacks without having a C_toplevel()

2005-08-29 Thread felix winkelmann
On 8/25/05, Daniel B. Faken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My question: what is the *appropriate* way to go about this? > Or, what is the minimum "boilerplate" required for a C_toplevel() > which just calls (return-to-host)? > - compiling just this statement generates about 130 LOC. > > (