Re: [Chicken-users] (new) gtk+ egg using swig

2005-08-31 Thread felix winkelmann
On 8/31/05, Alejandro Forero Cuervo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It seems to work but we still need to resolve some issues. > > We are currently doing this in our interface file: > > %{ > static void > EGG_signal_handle ( gpointer *obj, gpointer closure_root ) > { > C_callback(CHIC

Re: [Chicken-users] (new) gtk+ egg using swig

2005-08-31 Thread felix winkelmann
On 8/31/05, Alejandro Forero Cuervo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Manuel Alejandro CerĂ³n Estrada and I have started a gtk+ and a glib > 2.0 eggs to make these libraries callable from Chicken. We decided to > use the Chicken swig module to create them (instead of manually > defining all the bindi

Re: [Chicken-users] Even more format weirdness

2005-08-31 Thread felix winkelmann
On 8/30/05, Alejandro Forero Cuervo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The following expression triggers an error: > > (format #f "~,,1F" 0.001) > > I was expecting "0.01", of course. I'm using Chicken 2.0. > Thanks. I'm afraid, I'm not going to dig into format.scm to fix this, instead I wait f

Re: [Chicken-users] callbacks without having a C_toplevel()

2005-08-31 Thread felix winkelmann
On 8/25/05, Daniel B. Faken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I take this back.. It seems that macros are not available > -- not even require-extension! -- in CHICKEN_eval_string() & friends. > > (require 'ID) works, but if I try (include "chicken-more-macros"), > 'include' is not defined either. >