What's the oldest Chicken you think is likely to build the current
Chicken? I know Chicken 2.3 will do the job, what about earlier? I
have a minimum required build number set in CMake. I'll lower it + test
it, if something older is likely to work. The payoff, as I see it, is
leveraging
On 6/7/06, Daishi Kato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Tue, 6 Jun 2006 16:22:25 +0200,
felix winkelmann wrote:
Attached is my current selection of not yet used banners.
Please select one that pleases you more.
I like graffiti, speed, and shadow.
Mini is also nice, but might be too small for the
On 6/7/06, Brandon J. Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the oldest Chicken you think is likely to build the current
Chicken? I know Chicken 2.3 will do the job, what about earlier? I
have a minimum required build number set in CMake. I'll lower it + test
it, if something older is
Hi all,
When I update an egg that creates a dynamically linked object (.so), any
running chicken instance that already loaded the egg instantly segfaults at
the moment it tries to use a function from that egg. This is very
inconvenient when running long-lived processes like Spiffy.
After having
Hello,
it's probably important to know under which operating system this problem
occurs.
POSIX compliant systems allow the deletion of files while they are open
without causing trouble for the process that opened them. Win32 systems
don't regularly allow it -- and in the cases where they do,
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 08:25:21PM +0200, Thomas Chust wrote:
Hello,
it's probably important to know under which operating system this problem
occurs.
Sorry, should've stated this. I run NetBSD, which is, or at least aims to
be, POSIX-compliant.
snip
Maybe if you try to recompile the
Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
felix winkelmann wrote:
On 6/7/06, Brandon J. Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the oldest Chicken you think is likely to build the current
Chicken?
2.2 might work, but will generate a suboptimal chicken (there have been
some new declarations, which will
I notice that the link on the homepage claiming a Debian package is
dead. With some Google sleuthing I was able to find a current Debian
package: http://packages.debian.org/testing/interpreters/chicken-bin
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
felix winkelmann wrote:
On 6/7/06, Brandon J. Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the oldest Chicken you think is likely to build the current
Chicken?
2.2 might work, but will generate a suboptimal chicken (there have been
some
Frank wrote:
I'm not sure whether this helps you, but the new 2.315 just builds
fine w/ the VC 2003 toolkit when using makefile.vc and win-install.bat.
Yes I know, as does 2.3. But the point as per the subject line is to
bootstrap from older Chickens. For instance there are Debian distros
The problem here is that the srfi-40-base.scm registers
a srfi-40 feature id, which will later make csi believe that
srfi-40.scm is already loaded. Removing that register-feature!
call will make it work again.
Actually srfi-40-base.scm includes srfi-40.scm, which has the
register-feature!.
On Jun 7, 2006, at 8:55 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
The problem here is that the srfi-40-base.scm registers
a srfi-40 feature id, which will later make csi believe that
srfi-40.scm is already loaded. Removing that register-feature!
call will make it work again.
Actually
Should I remove that register-feature! from srfi-40.scm and update
the srfi-40 egg or would that break things?
No.
No, you shouldn't do that or no, that would not break things?
I expect you to reply something more specific than Yes. ;-)
Moving 'register-feature!' to the compiled file is
13 matches
Mail list logo
