Re: [Chicken-users] s11n among different chicken versions

On 8/3/06, Daishi Kato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now, I can reproduce the problem. % cat dump.scm (use s11n) (define x (make-hash-table)) (hash-table-set! x 'aaa (make-hash-table)) (hash-table-set! x 'bbb (make-hash-table)) (with-output-to-file dump (lambda () (serialize x))) % cat

Re: [Chicken-users] s11n among different chicken versions

On 8/7/06, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/3/06, Daishi Kato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now, I can reproduce the problem. % cat dump.scm (use s11n) (define x (make-hash-table)) (hash-table-set! x 'aaa (make-hash-table)) (hash-table-set! x 'bbb (make-hash-table))

Re: [Chicken-users] s11n among different chicken versions

On 8/7/06, Daishi Kato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the procedure ID is really re-used, the fallback procedure is never called, isn't it? That's correct, unfortunately. If I could not find any solution to this, my final resort would be editting the binary dump file to change procedure IDs.

Re: [Chicken-users] s11n among different chicken versions

On 8/7/06, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/7/06, Daishi Kato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the procedure ID is really re-used, the fallback procedure is never called, isn't it? That's correct, unfortunately. OK, I found another weird behavior. Procedures of hash-tables are

Re: [Chicken-users] s11n among different chicken versions

felix, Should this be a bug? Daishi Index: s11n/s11n.scm === --- s11n/s11n.scm (revision 1371) +++ s11n/s11n.scm (working copy) @@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ (cond ((##core#inline set_procedure_ptr x

Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Documentation

On 06/08/06, Brandon J. Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Harri Haataja wrote: On 29/05/06, Brandon J. Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan wrote: Just a small observation -- the propensity for long, complicated URL's isn't a win. Typing the full www.call/cc.org is a pain; Maybe

Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken/CMake succeeds on Sparc Solaris 8

On 06/08/06, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is using a 32-bit userland on a sun4u processor. I didn't test the numbers egg here, due to problems with GMP; I used the schelog egg as a test instead. Oh, there's a schelog egg! I hadn't noticed that. Cool. -- I appear to be temporarily

[Chicken-users] panic, horror, despair: thread-join! broken

Yes, it's true. Thanks to dgym on #chicken for reporting this: --- old-chicken/srfi-18.scm 2006-08-07 21:56:16.0 +0200 +++ new-chicken/srfi-18.scm 2006-08-07 21:56:16.0 +0200 @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ ct 1 (lambda () (case (##sys#slot

[Chicken-users] Re: can't compile the egg srfi-27

On Aug 7, 2006, at 5:53 AM, Tamas K Papp wrote: Hi Kon and Felix, Follow-up: it compiles with chicken 2.41. Kon: doesn't it also depend on vector-lib? At least I needed that. Uhh, right. Forgot about distributions. Sorry. Thank you. Kon Thanks, Tamas On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at

[Chicken-users] Strange `read-line' behaviour on Linux PPC

Hello, I'm facing a problem using `read-line' on Linux PPC. $ csi -n ___| |_) | | __ \ | __| | / _ \ __ \ | | | | | ( __/ | | \|_| |_|_|\___|_|\_\\___|_| _| Version 2, Build 41 - linux-unix-gnu-unknown - [ dload ptables applyhook ] (c)2000-2006 Felix L.

Re: [Chicken-users] chicken-setup doesn't handle whitespace

felix winkelmann wrote: On 8/6/06, Brandon J. Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is (quotewrap blah) code in csc.scm. It can be reused in chicken-setup.scm. It is mainly a question of where it needs to be used. I haven't had time or brainpower to deal with it. Paid my rent today with

[Chicken-users] egg directory in my HOME

Yesterday I did chicken-setup opengl with my CMake Cygwin installation, and it worked. But unfortunately, it created a directory in my HOME, ~/opengl.egg.dir . All the Cygwin stuff got built there. So now when I use my MinGW CMake build, it is copying the Cygwin dlls.