In the file attached to the message pointed by the link above, you can
find the code to map a part of an URL to a Scheme procedure name. To
achieve that, the http-server's `http:find-resource' procedure needs
to be modified to match regexes. As far as I understand, it's similar
to what you
On 10/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Does anybody have a binding for qdbm in chicken?
Not that I know of, but there's Alex Shinns gdbm.
cheers,
felix
--
http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br:8081/blog/blog.ssp
___
Chicken-users
-- Forwarded message --From: $) [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: 17.10.2006 13:30Subject: read-line (and probably other input routines) - unexpected behaviour when reading binary files on Windows
To: chicken-users@nongnu.orgHi!The Chicken manual says that read-line consumes all input from
Hello Andreas,
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:58:00 +0200 Andreas Zwinkau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the file attached to the message pointed by the link above, you can
find the code to map a part of an URL to a Scheme procedure name. To
achieve that, the http-server's `http:find-resource'
On 10/17/06, $) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if this behaviour is by design? Are there any issues related to
reading and writing binary data with ports in Chicken Scheme?
On Windows, you should pass #:binary (or binary:) to
procedures that open files to force binary mode (see the
On 10/17/06, Carlos Pita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if the softscheme egg improves performance of chicken
applications by removing unnecessary runtime type checks. I mean, aren't
the primitive operations type checked by themselves? For example, if
implementation of primitive + checks
$) scripsit:
The weird thing is that Scheme IO treats #\x1a (character with code 27) as
#!eof when reading from file.
This is a behavior hardwired into the Windows C library for compatibility
(I kid you not) with the CP/M operating system for 8-bit micros, which
did not record the exact
I'm not sure I understand. What do you mean variables in this
context?
Uh, sorry. I was talking about arguments. How does your
define-callable-url react on /add, /add/1 and /add/1/2? For summation it
may be ok to have a unspecified number of arguments, but consider
webapps like blogs or wikis.
Hello Andreas,
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:16:21 +0200 Andreas Zwinkau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure I understand. What do you mean variables in this
context?
Uh, sorry. I was talking about arguments. How does your
define-callable-url react on /add, /add/1 and /add/1/2? For summation
Set .csirc up for readline:
(require 'readline 'regex)
(current-input-port (make-gnu-readline-port csi ))
(gnu-history-install-file-manager (string-append (or (getenv HOME) .)
/.csi.history))
Type (define aaabbb 10), then try to complete aaabbb (by typing a prefix and
pressing tab). The
10 matches
Mail list logo