On 10/22/06, Andre Kuehne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just noticed that chicken.info is gone. Then ChangeLog tells me:
Sun Aug 20 22:07:13 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* expunge chicken.html, chicken.texi, chicken.info, parameters.scm
Any particular reason? I found it quite useful.
Me too!
On 10/22/06, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are (single-file) eggs for SRFI-85, recursive equivalence procedures,
and SRFI-95, simple sort-merge. SRFI-85 has been withdrawn, but there's
nothing wrong with it: it provides R6RS-style equality of infinite trees
under the name of equiv?,
On 10/22/06, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking of redefining cdr. No, really. What will that cost
me at compile time? Does the compiler have hard-wired knowledge
of cdr that will have to be modified, or is it treated just
like any other known function?
Like in the numbers
Thanks, Toby. Egg is updated.
cheers,
felix
On 10/22/06, Toby Butzon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 10/20/06, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another useful thing would be not to save duplicate lines, but it
requires marginally more work than just writing this message.
I think this
Hi all.
Here is an excerpt from a chicken-profile for one of my programs:
procedure calls seconds average percent
---
...
symbol-compare 1058128414 3467.563
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...] I looked at the definition of symbol-string and found out that it
is not a constant operation (like returning some pointer) but constructs
a string. Does anyone have a more efficient comparison of symbols
implemented? [...]
Hello,
as far
Hello Thomas.
If you want alphabetic ordering, you should avoid symbol-string, because
it copies the name of the symbol to a new string -- this is necessary as
Scheme's strings are mutable objects!
With some exceptions, like ... symbol-string :-)
It is an error to apply mutation procedures
On 10/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Thomas.
If you want alphabetic ordering, you should avoid symbol-string, because
it copies the name of the symbol to a new string -- this is necessary as
Scheme's strings are mutable objects!
With some exceptions, like ...
Hi!
I have problems compiling the following eggs using Chicken 2.5:
unix-sockets
srfi-66
tar
rlimit
spread
xosd
The problem is the same for all eggs: #! is translated to ! in the C
output, and #? to ? in the C output. When I change it to #, the
compiliation goes well.
I have looked in
On 10/23/06, Peter Busser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have problems compiling the following eggs using Chicken 2.5:
unix-sockets
srfi-66
tar
rlimit
spread
xosd
The problem is the same for all eggs: #! is translated to ! in the C
output, and #? to ? in the C output. When I change it to #,
On 10/23/06, Peter Busser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Is it possible to add a command-line switch to chicken-setup to set a
root-directory from which all installations are done?
This is useful because during package building, the files are installed
in a different directory than the root
felix winkelmann scripsit:
Like in the numbers egg, certain standard procedures are usually
inlined. cdr is among these. To disable that, do a
(declare (not standard-bindings cdr))
I understand that part now. I'm really more interested in getting
the compiler to inline my modified
Hi!
The sqlite3 egg has several problems:
-X easyffi is missing in the (compile ...) line, which breaks the
compilation.
It also needs easyffi and tinyclos, but they are not listed in the
repository dependency list.
Groetjes,
Peter.
___
And once again, thanks (new version uploaded)
cheers,
felix
On 10/23/06, Peter Busser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
The sqlite3 egg has several problems:
-X easyffi is missing in the (compile ...) line, which breaks the
compilation.
It also needs easyffi and tinyclos, but they are not
On 10/23/06, Andreas Zwinkau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 08:20:51 +0200
felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you provide the exact compilation instructions you
used to build cackle-base.so?
Just csc -s cackle-base.scm.
I uploaded the relevant files to
This is just to report a bug I found in the syntax-case egg. I hope
it is not a misundertanding on my case.
If I run csi and eval
(use html-stream syntax-case srfi-40)
(stream-cons foo stream-null)
I get
Error: unbound variable: stream-cons .
I tested under Chicken 2.5.
If I run csi and eval
(use html-stream syntax-case srfi-40)
(stream-cons foo stream-null)
I get
Error: unbound variable: stream-cons .
I found a simpler way to trigger the error. If I do
(use srfi-40 syntax-case)
(stream-cons foo stream-null) ; ,
The error
Alejandro Forero Cuervo scripsit:
I found a simpler way to trigger the error. If I do
(use srfi-40 syntax-case)
(stream-cons foo stream-null) ; ,
Yes, that fails for me too. If you use syntax-case first, it works.
--
John Cowanhttp://ccil.org/~cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The
On 10/23/06, Alejandro Forero Cuervo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is just to report a bug I found in the syntax-case egg. I hope
it is not a misundertanding on my case.
If I run csi and eval
(use html-stream syntax-case srfi-40)
(stream-cons foo stream-null)
I get
Error:
felix winkelmann scripsit:
Sorry, I have no quick-and-easy fix for this.
Well, the qe fix seems to be to load syntax-case before srfi-40.
Which is equivalent to using -R syntax-case.
--
John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ccil.org/~cowan
The exception proves the rule. Dimbulbs think: Your
felix winkelmann scripsit:
Sorry, I have no quick-and-easy fix for this.
Well, the qe fix seems to be to load syntax-case before srfi-40.
Which is equivalent to using -R syntax-case.
Fixing real code affected by a certain bug tends to be far more
difficult than fixing a specific examples
On 10/24/06, Alejandro Forero Cuervo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In this case, like I said in my original mail, my require-extension
expresions are scattered across multiple files that get loaded at
run-time in an unpredictable order and just some of them require
syntax-case. Why, even if the
22 matches
Mail list logo
