[Chicken-users] Spiffy

2006-12-09 Thread Dan Muresan
Hi, I have had, at last, the pleasure to play with spiffy to creaet a simple web front-end. As I said, it has been a pleasure, mostly, but there are some warts: * generate-directory-listing: the computation of the parent directory is broken: (string-intersperse (butlast foo)) intersperses

Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy

2006-12-09 Thread Peter Bex
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 08:22:56PM +0200, Dan Muresan wrote: Hi, I have had, at last, the pleasure to play with spiffy to creaet a simple web front-end. As I said, it has been a pleasure, mostly, but there are some warts: Let me add one observation to that: It probably would be nicer to

Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy

2006-12-09 Thread Dan Muresan
Oh yeah, now I remember: handlers (defined with http:add-resource or the spiffy helper macro) don't receive POST attributes in the the second argument (the args in (lambda (req args)). The built-in http:content-parser 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded parses POSTs just fine. But read-request

Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy

2006-12-09 Thread Dan Muresan
More remarks: * even with debug: #f, spiffy still logs 404's to stdout (or stderror -- not sure). This wouldn't be too bad, but for some other reason, it prevents the process from running in the background: whenever an output action is attempted, the shell tells me the job has been stopped.

[Chicken-users] any Windows Emacs haters here?

2006-12-09 Thread Brandon J. Van Every
I've had it with XEmacs, since by default it doesn't even indent my C code properly. I'm not about to chase around its stupid configuration magic invocations anymore. Plus, I'm totally sick of it crashing 20% of the time I do a Find, and I'm not interested in becoming a bug tester / reporter

Re: [Chicken-users] any Windows Emacs haters here?

2006-12-09 Thread Ivan Raikov
Have you tried the regular Emacs MinGW port? I have not used Emacs under Windows in a very long time, but I know that there is a package for Emacs in the mingwPORT system. -Ivan Brandon J. Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've had it with XEmacs, since by default it doesn't even

[Chicken-users] Msys install and \

2006-12-09 Thread Matthew David Parker
I'm trying to install chicken-2.5 on windows in MSYS. I tried using cmakeSetup to make MSYS makefiles, and then I compiled them from within MSYS by typing make and make install. I had it install to /bin within msys. For some reason, the binaries don't seem to read any command-line arguments.

Re: [Chicken-users] Msys install and \

2006-12-09 Thread Brandon J. Van Every
Matthew David Parker wrote: I'm trying to install chicken-2.5 on windows in MSYS. I tried using cmakeSetup to make MSYS makefiles, and then I compiled them from within MSYS by typing make and make install. I had it install to /bin within msys. For some reason, the binaries don't seem to read

[Chicken-users] (regexp) can not compile regular expression

2006-12-09 Thread Toby Butzon
Hi, I had stream-cgi working before (not exactly sure what changed, maybe a new chicken version?), but now just trying to (use) it does this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ csi ___| |_) | | __ \ | __| | / _ \ __ \ | | | | | ( __/ | | \|_| |_|_|\___|_|\_\\___|_| _|

[Chicken-users] Re: any Windows Emacs haters here?

2006-12-09 Thread Reed Sheridan
From: Brandon J. Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Chicken-users] any Windows Emacs haters here? To: chicken-users@nongnu.org I've had it with XEmacs, since by default it doesn't even indent my C code properly. I'm not about to chase around its stupid configuration magic invocations

Re: [Chicken-users] Re: any Windows Emacs haters here?

2006-12-09 Thread Brandon J. Van Every
Reed Sheridan wrote: Modifying the internals of some other IDE to avoid configuring your .emacs isn't going to save you any grief. Quite the opposite. You could probably figure out how to get Emacs to indent your code the way you want in a day, at worst. But that's what's ridiculous about