Hi!
Graham Fawcett has submitted the 256th egg:
http://chicken.wiki.br/sqlora
Thanks, Graham!
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
On 1/10/07, Daniel Sadilek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
this program causes a segmentation fault on Windows (cygwin) and Linux
with Chicken 2.5:
(define-record record value)
(print (make-record 1))
If I rename the record it works:
(define-record foo value)
(print (make-foo 1))
Uh oh -
On 1/10/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
felix winkelmann scripsit:
Hi!
Graham Fawcett has submitted the 256th egg:
http://chicken.wiki.br/sqlora
Does this mean the egg list is closed?
Or are we shooting for 512 eggs now?
That would be too Knuthian. But I can't come up with an
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:31:10 +0100 felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/10/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
felix winkelmann scripsit:
Hi!
Graham Fawcett has submitted the 256th egg:
http://chicken.wiki.br/sqlora
Does this mean the egg list is closed?
Or
Zbigniew scripsit:
The various SSAX egg ports also use 'include'. The reason is the
source distributions are made up of a bunch of interrelated .scm
files, with a lot of internal procedures that you don't want exported
to the user. One option is to generate separate .so files and use a
Apropos of nothing, if you surround the body of FAC with (let ((fac
fac)) ...) or even (let loop ((n n)) ...) then you avoid a global
lookup on FAC on every recursive call. This is the same as compiling
the file in block mode, except the latter doesn't work for exported
definitions. This is
On 1/10/07, Zbigniew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apropos of nothing, if you surround the body of FAC with (let ((fac
fac)) ...) or even (let loop ((n n)) ...) then you avoid a global
lookup on FAC on every recursive call. This is the same as compiling
the file in block mode, except the latter
On 10 Jan 2007 15:44:27 -0200, Mario Domenech Goulart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:31:10 +0100 felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/10/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
felix winkelmann scripsit:
Hi!
Graham Fawcett has submitted the 256th egg:
Hi!
Or how about each 16th egg, for the next 256 eggs? (I'd be willing to
buy a t-shirt or three, to help keep the egg-stream flowing.)
What about this: A random selected person of the group of people who
added an egg during 3 months. Or 4 months or whatever period of time.
That means that
On 1/10/07, Peter Busser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about this: A random selected person of the group of people who
added an egg during 3 months. Or 4 months or whatever period of time.
That means that everyone who adds an egg has a chance to get one.
+1.
--G
Graham Fawcett wrote:
On 1/10/07, Peter Busser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about this: A random selected person of the group of people who
added an egg during 3 months. Or 4 months or whatever period of time.
That means that everyone who adds an egg has a chance to get one.
+1.
Yep, I was
2007/1/11, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 1/10/07, minh thu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've used PRINT, DISPLAY, WRITE, and NEWLINE in a thread created from
csi (the actual
thread-making function is in a .so). The thread is just a loop waiting
one second before the next
12 matches
Mail list logo
