Hi!
A release canditate for CHICKEN 2.6 is now available at
the web-site. If you find the time, please give it a try.
I've forgotten the updated NEWS file at home and will
post a list of changes later.
Thanks.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users
S-Lang (also known as slang or SLang, I'll call it slang from now on)
is a very well established, well supported, text-based user interface.
John E. Davis used slang to produce his slrn Usenet newsreader and
the JED text editor, and the mutt mailer and lynx web browser also
use slang's display
The nearest thing we have for mapping unsigned char * is c-string, but
using that interface makes a compiler complaint of the following
type:
slang.c:1254: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of
'SLang_buffer_keystring' differ in signedness
This is just a niggle, really, because it
Tony Sidaway scripsit:
The nearest thing we have for mapping unsigned char * is c-string, but
using that interface makes a compiler complaint of the following
type:
slang.c:1254: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of
'SLang_buffer_keystring' differ in signedness
Actually,
On 2/26/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, it's architecture dependent whether char is a synonym for
signed char or for unsigned char. Rather than complicating the
interface, I'd rather live with the gcc warning.
Yes, you would want to use c-string without a sign qualification
Tony Sidaway scripsit:
Yes, you would want to use c-string without a sign qualification if
the sign is to be decided by the compiler. It's when the programmer
makes a choice (presumably because it matters at some semantic level
or other) that I'd suggest that the foreign interface should
On 2/26/07, Tony Sidaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/26/07, Tony Sidaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've wrapped many of this library's display and keyboard control
routines in a new egg, slang.egg.
Um yes, The all-important details follow:
An interrupt handler written in Chicken Scheme probably can't do a lot
without knocking over a heap of dominoes.
Nevertheless, would a simple lambda that only changes a top level flag
variable be stable enough to be useful? This is often all that posix
interrupt handlers written in C do anyway.
To clarify my earlier post, procedure sigX-handler should be executed
when the interrupt fires. The procedure handle-sigX is executed by
the program when it polls the signal flag and finds it in a set state.
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Hello everyone,
I have a strange problem with some chicken code here (mainly involves
bb.egg and some opengl code - but that's not important for the moment).
My program quits with error messages like
Error: call of non-procedure: error in error
and a backtrace of ##sys#setter calls.
Can the
Tony Sidaway scripsit:
An interrupt handler written in Chicken Scheme probably can't do a lot
without knocking over a heap of dominoes.
Nevertheless, would a simple lambda that only changes a top level flag
variable be stable enough to be useful? This is often all that posix
interrupt
On Feb 26, 2007, at 8:02 AM, John Cowan wrote:
Tony Sidaway scripsit:
An interrupt handler written in Chicken Scheme probably can't do a
lot
without knocking over a heap of dominoes.
Nevertheless, would a simple lambda that only changes a top level
flag
variable be stable enough to be
felix winkelmann scripsit:
Hi!
A release canditate for CHICKEN 2.6 is now available at
the web-site. If you find the time, please give it a try.
Works fine under Cygwin with CMake.
--
In politics, obedience and support John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are the same thing. --Hannah Arendt
2007/2/26, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
felix winkelmann scripsit:
Hi!
A release canditate for CHICKEN 2.6 is now available at
the web-site. If you find the time, please give it a try.
Works fine under Cygwin with CMake.
Is it interesting to mention it works under ubuntu with
On Feb 26, 2007, at 10:29 AM, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
John Cowan wrote:
felix winkelmann scripsit:
Hi!
A release canditate for CHICKEN 2.6 is now available at
the web-site. If you find the time, please give it a try.
Works fine under Cygwin with CMake.
Builds and installs fine
I tried a big SWIG wrap on part of a C++ library. This generated a
.cxx wrap file and a .scm file.
The build sequence I'm using is this:
$(CHICKEN) tvision.scm -output-file otvision.c
$(CXX) --shared otvision.c tvision_wrap.cxx -o tvision.so
`rhtv-config --include` `rhtv-config
What version of SWIG are you using? I've seen this problem with
versions prior to 1.3.29.
-Ivan
Tony Sidaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I tried a big SWIG wrap on part of a C++ library. This generated a
.cxx wrap file and a .scm file.
The build sequence I'm using is this:
Hi Felix and folks,
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:12:58 +0100 felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A release canditate for CHICKEN 2.6 is now available at
the web-site. If you find the time, please give it a try.
I could build, install and run the benchmarks on the following
systems:
OS
Everybody,
Many many thanks for testing so thoroughly the build!
(BTW, what I usually do is to chicken-setup and run some egg
with a lot of dependencies in an empty repository (for example
bloom-filter)).
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing
On 2/26/07, Tony Sidaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried a big SWIG wrap on part of a C++ library. This generated a
.cxx wrap file and a .scm file.
The build sequence I'm using is this:
$(CHICKEN) tvision.scm -output-file otvision.c
$(CXX) --shared otvision.c tvision_wrap.cxx
On 2/26/07, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
A release canditate for CHICKEN 2.6 is now available at
the web-site. If you find the time, please give it a try.
I've done a build and a Cowan-test on (solaris-unix-gnu-sparc). All seems well.
Graham
On 2/26/07, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The missing symbol is strange, though. Check the _wrap.cxx file and
the binaries with nm (and c++filt
genRefs() only appears as a friend function in the class prototypes;
it isn't implemented so it doesn't belong in the wrap.
I removed
22 matches
Mail list logo
