On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 07:44:19AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
On 10/31/07, Ozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I think I understand what you're getting it. Unfortunately I can't get
it to
work. You'll have to excuse the thrown-together quality of the code below,
but
it
On 10/31/07, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The exit will not invoke any pending dynamic-wind thunks
Why not? Shouldn't it? IMHO it violates POLA not to do so.
Because it might not be desired. It shouldn't. And I don't know who POLA
is, nor did I meeet her before.
cheers,
felix
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:24:44AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
On 10/31/07, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The exit will not invoke any pending dynamic-wind thunks
Why not? Shouldn't it? IMHO it violates POLA not to do so.
Because it might not be desired.
Why wouldn't it if
On 10/31/07, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:24:44AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
On 10/31/07, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The exit will not invoke any pending dynamic-wind thunks
Why not? Shouldn't it? IMHO it violates POLA not to do so.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:23:59AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
Why wouldn't it if you use dynamic-wind? The thunk is exited by
calling (exit), isn't it? So I would *expect* it to call the 'after'
part of the dynamic-wind. Just from reading the standard I would never
consider the
On 10/31/07, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, so be it. I'll add a note to 'extensions to the standard' and the
documentation of 'exit' because I'm sure there are more people out there
who are not aware of this.
This has nothing to do with the standard. exit is not a standard
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 12:09:27PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
On 10/31/07, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, so be it. I'll add a note to 'extensions to the standard' and the
documentation of 'exit' because I'm sure there are more people out there
who are not aware of this.
Ozzi wrote:
Thomas Christian Chust wrote:
I think it would suffice for daemonize to wrap the call to the daemon's
main procedure in a dynamic-wind block and call the cleanup function
from the exit thunk. Unless the daemon procedure terminates itself with
a low-level _exit or by sending
In svn r6219 print was changed to return void at all times. Just
wondering what prompted this change as it was useful for quick
debugging, i.e. replace x with (print x) without affecting your
results.
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Hi.
Mario and I have just updated the version of Svnwiki in Galinha to the
latest. This should have some minor user interface improvements and
bug fixes.
If you notice anything unusual, please let me know.
Thanks!
Alejo.
http://azul.freaks-unidos.net/
A pure Scheme implementation that (IIRC) comes relatively close to
C's printf is part of slib: [...]
Or, if only basic support for sequences such as %d and %s is
needed, this should be very easy to implement on top of format-modular:
(use format-modular)
(define printf-formatter
11 matches
Mail list logo
