Hi,
It seems http://trac.callcc.org/changeset/7190 hasn't get to the spiffy egg.
Should I get spiffy from svn ?
Thanks,
mt
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 12:49:05PM +0100, minh thu wrote:
Hi,
It seems http://trac.callcc.org/changeset/7190 hasn't get to the spiffy egg.
Should I get spiffy from svn ?
Yes, until there's a new release you'd have to use trunk. Sorry for that.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
Hi,
Currently, I use a makefile to build an egg. Is it possible to create
it with the same process .meta file is automatically used when
committing in svn (i.e. locally, with no real commit)?
Thanks,
mt
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Yes, that egg was pointed out to me. It's a neat egg, but I feel more
complicated than necessary 9 times out of 10.
Ivan Raikov wrote:
Hello,
If I understand this description correctly, the runcmd egg has this
functionality. Take a look at its documentation and see if it would
work for you.
I recently saw this interesting talk about Chicken:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL_-1d9OSdk
You may want to check it out. :-)
Alejo.
http://azul.freaks-unidos.net/
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:59:22 -0800 Alejandro Forero Cuervo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I recently saw this interesting talk about Chicken:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL_-1d9OSdk
You may want to check it out. :-)
You may also want to try a web REPL for chicken:
Ozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am using the following code, which just takes a single string:
(define (system-string cmd)
(string-chomp (with-input-from-pipe cmd read-all)))
On Jan 14, 2008 1:45 PM, Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See also
On Jan 10, 2008 10:11 AM, Ozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using the following code, which just takes a single string:
(define (system-string cmd)
(string-chomp (with-input-from-pipe cmd read-all)))
First, the string-chomp is pointless unless you're reading only one
line. Why chomp just
Hi minh thu,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:02:55 +0100 minh thu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently, I use a makefile to build an egg. Is it possible to create
it with the same process .meta file is automatically used when
committing in svn (i.e. locally, with no real commit)?
I don't know if I
Zbigniew [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am using the following code, which just takes a single string:
(define (system-string cmd) (string-chomp (with-input-from-pipe cmd
read-all)))
First, the string-chomp is pointless unless you're reading only one
line. Why chomp just the last
14 Jan 2008 18:02:15 -0200, Mario Domenech Goulart [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi minh thu,
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:02:55 +0100 minh thu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently, I use a makefile to build an egg. Is it possible to create
it with the same process .meta file is automatically used when
Ivan Shmakov scripsit:
Believe me or not, but the POSIX Shell behaves exactly that way.
Sensibly so: what you get is a newline-separated list of lines,
with no random empty line at the end to confuse matters.
I'm not sure that one should mimic the Shell behaviour in
Scheme,
how about
(define (system-string . args)
(string-chomp (with-input-from-pipe (string-join args ) read-all)))
this is assuming that you meant that you want to construct a single command
from a list of strings. if you wanted each string to be a separate command
it could look like:
(define
On Jan 14, 2008 5:00 PM, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ivan Shmakov scripsit:
Believe me or not, but the POSIX Shell behaves exactly that way.
Sensibly so: what you get is a newline-separated list of lines,
with no random empty line at the end to confuse matters.
It is sensible
14 matches
Mail list logo
