On May 28, 2008, at 9:18 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
On 5/28/08, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I use the "anaphoric" forms but not "in anger." Yeah, the above is
more Scheme-ish but I suggest leaving "it."
OK, I changed it back in my copy. The totally hygienic versions are
still in there
On 5/28/08, Kon Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use the "anaphoric" forms but not "in anger." Yeah, the above is
> more Scheme-ish but I suggest leaving "it."
OK, I changed it back in my copy. The totally hygienic versions are
still in there, just commented out.
Anyway, hygienic if* is bas
On May 28, 2008, at 8:33 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
Thank you Jim for your recent life on the bleeding edge. (And Felix
for expanding space.) I haven't visited yet so anything I say is
subject to ignorance.
I ported miscmacros (attached) to the hygienic branch and had a couple
questions.
Fir
On 5/28/08, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2) Throw something like (display foobar), where foobar is unbound,
>> into your module and at runtime it will actually display #> value> without throwing an error. If a procedure is unbound, it
>> similarly complains about 'Error: ca
I ported miscmacros (attached) to the hygienic branch and had a couple
questions.
First, is anyone using miscmacros? I was wondering about the following
proposed change to the anaphoric macros:
Current -> Proposed
(if* x y z) -> (if* (it x) y z)
(while* test body) -> (while*
Hi,
I've updated the egg (v1.1), which hopefully works fine.
Please give it a try.
I've been testing against debian libsvm package.
--daishi
At Tue, 27 May 2008 12:50:13 -0700,
Tom Poliquin wrote:
>
> I'm trying to install the libsvm egg and not
> having much success.
>
> The libsvm egg requir
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Jim Ursetto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also managed to port vector-lib.egg over.
>
> Minor issues encountered during the port:
>
> 1) Warnings aren't issued for unbound identifiers -- I spent a while
> tracking down a weird error and it turns out I forgot to i
