Re: [Chicken-users] no soname

2009-03-19 Thread felix winkelmann
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Ivan Raikov ivan.g.rai...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Felix,   This means that we cannot have a Debian package for Chicken 4, because Debian insists on having a soname version, so that it can do things like installing libchicken 3 and 4 alongside each other. How

Re: [Chicken-users] no soname

2009-03-19 Thread Tobia Conforto
felix winkelmann wrote: I wonder what's the point of enforcing use of soname, if (for example) header-files are usually not versioned. What if you want to install a chicken.h 3 and 4 alongside each other? I believe it's a matter of end user support. A developer who wants to build against

Re: [Chicken-users] no soname

2009-03-19 Thread Jim Ursetto
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:18 AM, felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Ivan Raikov ivan.g.rai...@gmail.com wrote:   This means that we cannot have a Debian package for Chicken 4, because Debian insists on having a soname version, so that it can do things