[Chicken-users] mac os x and cflags

Hi! Alex reported that architecture-specific compiler options don't seem to be passed by csc on Mac OS X. I massages Makefile.macosx a bit, but can not test it right now (and could only try the default ppc build, anyway). So if a Mac OS user would try it out, I'd appreciate it (the order in which

[Chicken-users] testing release candidate for 4.0.0

Hi! The current release candidate can be found at: http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/chicken-4.0.0.tar.gz I tested it on several systems (mingw(+msys), linux), but would appreciate if others could give it a try. Note that some minor recent trunk changes didn't make it, due to

[Chicken-users] Re: testing release candidate for 4.0.0

Hello! felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com writes: The current release candidate can be found at: http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/chicken-4.0.0.tar.gz I tested it on several systems (mingw(+msys), linux), but would appreciate if others could give it a try. Note that some

Re: [Chicken-users] testing release candidate for 4.0.0

Hi Felix, MSVC+Cygwin's tools. Build failed since both chichen-defaults and chicken-config contain something like this: /backup /bin /cygdrive /cygwin.bat /cygwin.ico /dev /etc /home /lib /proc /tmp /usr /var generated benchmarks/ html/ scripts/ tests/ Is it expected? Seems that it's caused by

Re: [Chicken-users] testing release candidate for 4.0.0

no. what happened is that the quoting rules are screwed up. i forgot to backport the makefile from 3. ill do it in a few. (youre seeing what happens when the 'cat' or 'type' goes horribly wrong. note how the slashes go from one side to the other.) -elf On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Ivan

Re: [Chicken-users] testing release candidate for 4.0.0

Hi Felix On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:31:24 +0100 felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com wrote: The current release candidate can be found at: http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/chicken-4.0.0.tar.gz I tested it on several systems (mingw(+msys), linux), but would appreciate if others

[Chicken-users] -prologue

Hello, I just noticed that something like this: csc somefile.scm -dynamic -prologue SOME-DIRECTORY doesn't produce an error. Does it make sense to pass a directory to '-prologue'? Just wondering if maybe 'csc' should print an error in the above case. Ed

Re: [Chicken-users] testing release candidate for 4.0.0

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:31:24PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote: I tested it on several systems (mingw(+msys), linux), but would appreciate if others could give it a try. Note that some minor recent trunk changes didn't make it, due to unclear portability. On OpenBSD 4.5 x86: Compiles both