[Chicken-users] Re: Scheme Steering Committee Questions

2009-08-28 Thread felix
Kon Lovett klovett at pacbell.net writes: Hi Folks, Aug 30th I will be meeting w/ some members of the Scheme Steering Committee (Olin Shivers, William D Clinger, and maybe Marc Feeley). Wow! Have a good time. cheers, felix ___

Re: [Chicken-users] Scheme Steering Committee Questions

2009-08-28 Thread Ivan Raikov
Hi Kon, I would be curious to know what their position is on the SRFI process with respect to the Scheme standard. R6RS is deliberately incompatible with SRFI-1, and I see this as an attempt to subvert the SRFI process. Does the current Scheme Steering Committee consider it necessary to

[Chicken-users] -embedded and main()

2009-08-28 Thread Derrell Piper
-embedded doesn't seem to actually suppress the creation of main() though it doesn't seem to matter in most cases. However in another context, and under 3.4.0, I'm getting a duplicate main() ld error that is resolved by deleting the 'C_main_entry_point' declaration from the

[Chicken-users] Re: -embedded and main()

2009-08-28 Thread Derrell Piper
It seems to matter how I invoke the compiler. I could definitely use some enlightenment here... fluffy% csc -e -k e.scm c.c fluffy% cp e.c e.c.1 fluffy% csc -k e.scm c.c ld: duplicate symbol _main in c.o and e.o collect2: ld returned 1 exit status *** Shell command terminated with exit status

[Chicken-users] -embedded and main()

2009-08-28 Thread Derrell Piper
I botched the folllow up, what I meant to show was this: fluffy% csc -e -t -k e.scm fluffy% cp e.c e.c.1 fluffy% csc -t -k e.scm fluffy% diff e.c e.c.1 3c3 2009-08-28 10:37 --- 2009-08-28 10:36 There doesn't seem to be any difference in the resulting c.

[Chicken-users] OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED

2009-08-28 Thread Sven Hartrumpf
Hi all. Chicken has a new build option to be passed to 'make': OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED=1 It turns on -O3 instead of -Os (Linux). As I reported earlier this summer, the 'make check' always fails for me when using -O3. See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2009-07/msg00029.html for