Re: [Chicken-users] Fwd: Newbie question - Converting SKILL/Scheme to C.

2009-09-02 Thread Nicholas Indy Ray
So, Don't confuse the fact that Chicken compiles to C with being able to translate to C. The result of the Chicken compiler is doubtful to be maintainable by hand. If you run csc -t on a source file that actually compiles, you will see what sort of C Chicken generates. If you're still trying to

Re: [Chicken-users] Fwd: Newbie question - Converting SKILL/Scheme to C.

2009-09-02 Thread Yaron Kretchmer
Thanks Nicholas The fact that the C code resulting from the translation is not humanly readable is not important to me. I only intend to compile the C code and link it against other libraries. /* */ style comments not being supported is a minor problem. Infix not being supported is a slightly

Re: [Chicken-users] srfi-19

2009-09-02 Thread Christian Kellermann
Hi Dave, find a patch for the srfi-19 egg attached to this email. When applied to the trunk of the chicken3 egg it will happily install on chicken 4. This has been sent to Kon for review, so don't consider this one blessed by the original author. Maybe Kon will get around to commit this soon.

[Chicken-users] latest (rev 15708) build on OpenBSD

2009-09-02 Thread David N Murray
Hi, Should this go to chicken-devel? I just checked out the latest via subversion and was trying to build it on an OpenBSD AMD64 box. It built fine, but runtests.sh fails: library tests ... Error: unbound variable: +inf. Call history:

Re: [Chicken-users] srfi-19

2009-09-02 Thread David N Murray
On Sep 2, Christian Kellermann scribed: find a patch for the srfi-19 egg attached to this email. When applied to the trunk of the chicken3 egg it will happily install on chicken 4. This has been sent to Kon for review, so don't consider this one blessed by the original author. Maybe Kon will

[Chicken-users] 4.1 check-errors

2009-09-02 Thread David N Murray
I'm trying to chicken-install locale and it requires check-errors. check-errors fails to build because it tries to import srfi-12 (the require is commented out, but the egg won't install). I removed srfi-12 from the import list of conditions.scm (patch attached) and the tests all ran fine.

Re: [Chicken-users] 4.1 check-errors

2009-09-02 Thread Kon Lovett
On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:17 PM, David N Murray wrote: I'm trying to chicken-install locale and it requires check-errors. check-errors fails to build because it tries to import srfi-12 (the require is commented out, but the egg won't install). I removed srfi-12 from the import list of

Re: [Chicken-users] srfi-19

2009-09-02 Thread Kon Lovett
On Sep 2, 2009, at 1:50 PM, David N Murray wrote: On Sep 2, Christian Kellermann scribed: find a patch for the srfi-19 egg attached to this email. When applied to the trunk of the chicken3 egg it will happily install on chicken 4. This has been sent to Kon for review, so don't consider this

[Chicken-users] Scheme pre-processor

2009-09-02 Thread Angerer Christoph
Hi, I was wondering if chicken scheme has some kind of command-line pre processor that 'normalizes' a scheme source file (and outputs it to STD out or another file)? By 'normalizing' I mean expanding all macros as well as special forms such as quotes and unquotes into the equivalent pure

[Chicken-users] Furry paws...

2009-09-02 Thread Eduardo Cavazos
... is sooo frickin amazing. Is there an interactive interpreter/repl for FP somewhere? Ed ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] Scheme pre-processor

2009-09-02 Thread Kon Lovett
On Sep 2, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Angerer Christoph wrote: Hi, I was wondering if chicken scheme has some kind of command-line pre processor that 'normalizes' a scheme source file (and outputs it to STD out or another file)? By 'normalizing' I mean expanding all macros as well as special

Re: [Chicken-users] Furry paws...

2009-09-02 Thread Kon Lovett
On Sep 2, 2009, at 10:13 PM, Eduardo Cavazos wrote: ... is sooo frickin amazing. Is there an interactive interpreter/repl for FP somewhere? Doesn't fp -i enter interactive mode? Ed ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org

Re: [Chicken-users] Furry paws...

2009-09-02 Thread Eduardo Cavazos
On Sep 2, 2009, at 10:13 PM, Eduardo Cavazos wrote: ... is sooo frickin amazing. Is there an interactive interpreter/repl for FP somewhere? Kon Lovett wrote: Doesn't fp -i enter interactive mode? Hello Kon! Hmmm... I don't have an 'fp' binary here. Just 'fpc'. Ed