Sorry! I just realized that (record-instance?) was in 'lolevel'. I've been
doing (use SRFI-9) instead.
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
From: Jack Trades jacktradespub...@gmail.com
Subject: [Chicken-users] Re: Creating new types and their representation in the
REPL
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 01:05:33 -0500
Sorry! I just realized that (record-instance?) was in 'lolevel'.
That's the one.
cheers,
felix
Hi Jack
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 01:05:33 -0500 Jack Trades jacktradespub...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sorry! I just realized that (record-instance?) was in 'lolevel'.
I've been doing (use SRFI-9) instead.
Maybe you already know and are using it but, just in case, chickadee
(http://3e8.org/chickadee/)
Thanks, I didn't know where the documentation for define-record was.
To get the documentation of some macro or procedure, call it symbol,
you may try to go to http://chicken.wiki.br/symbol, which will often
redirect you to the right page and location. In this case, you'd try:
When an assertion (based on the “assert” macro) fails, Chicken
currently prints something like:
Error: assertion failed: (some-expr)
Call history:
##sys#error --
Could the definition of the assert macro be modified to include in the
output the
What's going wrong here?
$ cat t.scm
(define *hash* (make-hash-table))
$ csi t.scm
; loading t.scm ...
#;1 *hash*
#hash-table (0)
$ csc t.scm
$ ./t
Error: unbound variable: make-hash-table
Call history:
t.scm:1: make-hash-table--
$ csc -version
Hi Martin
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 22:14:09 +0530 Martin DeMello martindeme...@gmail.com
wrote:
What's going wrong here?
$ cat t.scm
(define *hash* (make-hash-table))
$ csi t.scm
; loading t.scm ...
#;1 *hash*
#hash-table (0)
$ csc t.scm
$ ./t
Error: unbound variable: make-hash-table
Hi Felix
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 12:29:27 +0200 (CEST) Felix
fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote:
There is a new extension called `bind', which supersedes
`easyffi':
http://chicken.wiki.br/eggref/4/bind
It has better integration with coops and provides a simpler
interface (and
(use srfi-69)
On Jul 9, 2010, at 11:44, Martin DeMello martindeme...@gmail.com wrote:
What's going wrong here?
$ cat t.scm
(define *hash* (make-hash-table))
$ csi t.scm
; loading t.scm ...
#;1 *hash*
#hash-table (0)
$ csc t.scm
$ ./t
Error: unbound variable: make-hash-table
Martin, feel free to join us on freenode on #chicken as well, we can answer all
kinds of questions there.
On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:04, Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Martin
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 22:14:09 +0530 Martin DeMello martindeme...@gmail.com
wrote:
What's
Thanks, Jim and Mario! And thanks for the pointer to the IRC channel,
will drop by if I have any more questions.
martin
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com wrote:
Martin, feel free to join us on freenode on #chicken as well, we can answer
all kinds of questions
From: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] bind
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:16:31 -0400
Hi Felix
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 12:29:27 +0200 (CEST) Felix
fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote:
There is a new extension called `bind', which supersedes
From: Alejandro Forero Cuervo a...@freaks-unidos.net
Subject: Showing source:line in output of failed assertions?
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 14:57:40 +0200
When an assertion (based on the “assert” macro) fails, Chicken
currently prints something like:
Error: assertion failed: (some-expr)
13 matches
Mail list logo
