Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs

2010-08-31 Thread Felix
From: Jim Pryor lists+chic...@jimpryor.net Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:53:15 -0400 Those are all clear enough. The wiki says needs and depends are synonyms, correct? Yes. files ; I guess this is obvious file; srfi-63 has

Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs

2010-08-31 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Felix and folks On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:26:18 -0400 (EDT) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: From: Jim Pryor lists+chic...@jimpryor.net Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:53:15 -0400 files ; I guess this is obvious file

Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs

2010-08-31 Thread Moritz Heidkamp
Hi, first of all: thanks Jim for bringing this up, this will definitely help to clean up our repository a bit :-) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org writes: The version is either the tag directory or inside the setup file. I wonder how that works when installing directly from a

[Chicken-users] chicken-install -p

2010-08-31 Thread Felix
Hello! The -p option to chicken-install should normally do the right thing (no need to override CHICKEN_INSTALL_PREFIX). The `files' entries in the generated .setup-info file will be wrong, but this is only relevant to uninstalling, which is presumably done by your package manager anyway.

Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs

2010-08-31 Thread Felix
From: Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:16:43 -0400 Hi Felix and folks On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:26:18 -0400 (EDT) Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: From: Jim Pryor

Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs

2010-08-31 Thread Felix
From: Moritz Heidkamp mor...@twoticketsplease.de Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:51:52 +0200 Hi, first of all: thanks Jim for bringing this up, this will definitely help to clean up our repository a bit :-) Felix