Hello,
I've run into a case where a thread that uses thread-sleep! for a
fixed amount of time seems to never wake up. I can reproduce this from
csi as well:
CHICKEN
(c)2008-2010 The Chicken Team
(c)2000-2007 Felix L. Winkelmann
Version 4.6.0
linux-unix-gnu-x86-64 [ 64bit manyargs dload ptables ]
Dear All,
distinct? from amb-extras fails with an bad argument count error
when srfi-1 is not loaded. In that case the member procedure from
'scheme' and not srfi-1 is used, which doesn't take a additional
equality procedure as used by distinct?.
Adding srfi-1 to the imports as in the attached
Markus Klotzbuecher scripsit:
distinct? from amb-extras fails with an bad argument count error
when srfi-1 is not loaded. In that case the member procedure from
'scheme' and not srfi-1 is used, which doesn't take a additional
equality procedure as used by distinct?.
In the R7RS small
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 22:25, David N Murray dmur...@jsbsystems.com wrote:
Tests OK in 4.6.5. (Sorry, don't have 4.6.0 installed anymore.)
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 03:19, Felix
fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote:
Can you try a newer chicken version? I can't reproduce this right
This may be old news already, but I was curious about the enhanced-scrutiny
branch in git. Found out that it wouldn't compile (last 2 changes).
It stopped at scrutinizer.scm, and looking at the file...well, it looks sorta
mangled. I tried to make sense of it, but didn't get far due to lack
2011/3/28 Markus Klotzbuecher m...@marumbi.de:
[...]
distinct? from amb-extras fails with an bad argument count error
when srfi-1 is not loaded. In that case the member procedure from
'scheme' and not srfi-1 is used, which doesn't take a additional
equality procedure as used by distinct?.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:21 AM, John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org wrote:
Markus Klotzbuecher scripsit:
distinct? from amb-extras fails with an bad argument count error
when srfi-1 is not loaded. In that case the member procedure from
'scheme' and not srfi-1 is used, which doesn't take a
