Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] SRFI-99 record types for CHICKEN

2011-09-15 Thread Thomas Chust
Hello, my implementation of SRFI-99 is now available as an egg. I have fixed some problems concerning unchecked block access and have added support for arbitrary record type properties, similar to the structure properties of Racket, as another extension. The implemented extensions to the SRFI-99

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] SRFI-99 record types for CHICKEN

2011-09-15 Thread Peter Bex
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:46:30AM +0200, Thomas Chust wrote: Hello, my implementation of SRFI-99 is now available as an egg. Congrats on the release. The egg is served directly from its Fossil repository (check the release information file at

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] SRFI-99 record types for CHICKEN

2011-09-15 Thread Thomas Chust
2011/9/15 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl: On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:46:30AM +0200, Thomas Chust wrote: [...] The egg is served directly from its Fossil repository (check the release information file [...]. In contrast to what the CHICKEN wiki claims, it is possible to serve raw files and

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] SRFI-99 record types for CHICKEN

2011-09-15 Thread Peter Bex
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:36:02PM +0200, Thomas Chust wrote: Hello Peter, in fact, I think it was always the case, but several aspects of it are poorly documented in the Fossil manual. For example, you could always use symbolic tags in any place where a changeset ID was expected, but

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] SRFI-99 record types for CHICKEN

2011-09-15 Thread Thomas Chust
2011/9/15 Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org: [...] One question: would it be possible to optionally support SRFI-17 setters for record slots? [...] Hello Felix, for SRFI-99 compliance, separate setter procedures must be generated. But the getter procedures generated by my