Kon (or maybe Felix)
On Sep 1 2011, Kon Lovett wrote:
Probably of no use to you but … When I added all the extra unix
(Chicken v2 I think) signals stuff I figured (ha) that a Scheme
signal handler could only perform operations that accessed existing
structures, no heap mutation. I used
Hi,
in this message
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2011-09/msg00292.html
I sent out a strange bug. Sorry for that.
The child-registering fork() should be:
(define (save-fork)
(let* ((ie (##sys#fudge 14))
(pid (begin (chicken-disable-interrupts!)
On Oct 2 2011, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Kon (or maybe Felix)
On Sep 1 2011, Kon Lovett wrote:
Probably of no use to you but … When I added all the extra unix
(Chicken v2 I think) signals stuff I figured (ha) that a Scheme
signal handler could only perform operations that accessed
* John Gabriele jmg3...@gmail.com [110823 07:27]:
Regarding the chickenista guide pdf, some minor issues I noticed:
[snip]
As far as more substantial feedback on the content itself, I would've
liked longer descriptions for most of the bullet points in section
4.4, as well as more explanation
The below code used to do a fine job of eval'ing a hodge-podge file of lists
and strings but in Chicken4.7 the eval doesn't seem to see compiled routines
in the parent code. Has eval changed in some incompatible way or do I need
to keep digging for some other bug :) ?
(let* ((p
