* Paul Colby paulcco...@earthlink.net [111011 05:14]:
Hi,
I noticed what I feel is an incorrect behavior for the function sorted?
My understanding is that (sorted? list test) should return #t if pairwise
the elements of list (test e-n e-n+1) is true for all n. However, I get
the following
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:51:29PM +0900, Ivan Raikov wrote:
Hi all,
It seems that the egg categories Uncategorized or invalid and
Miscellaneous have swelled quite a bit since the last time there was a
major reorganization.
So I propose to reassign the categories of the eggs
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:51:29PM +0900, Ivan Raikov wrote:
efax - Networking
smsmatrix - Networking
I don't really consider sending fax or SMS messages networking.
Both happen to use a webservice to do this, but does that make it
a networking egg?
Of course I can change the category if
Good point, I did not think to check where these eggs are hosted. So
here is the revised list; I have marked the eggs not hosted on
call-cc.org with an asterisk (*) and I advise their respective authors
to correct the categories. And yes, changing the category would also
necessitate tagging a
Of course, these are just suggestions. Networking was the closest to
Communication which would have been a more appropriate category for
smsmatrix and efax. It's not that Miscellaneous is not correct, I
would just like to keep it from becoming too populous, if possible.
-Ivan
Peter Bex
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 04:44:19PM +0900, Ivan Raikov wrote:
Of course, these are just suggestions. Networking was the closest to
Communication which would have been a more appropriate category for
smsmatrix and efax. It's not that Miscellaneous is not correct, I
would just like to
Peter,
I've got one more issue fixed wrt. the fix I posted recently
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2011-10/txtQD3AT30Qxp.txt
Since I'm recovering from a big mess I made out of my build envt.
Here only a description:
In C_a_i_string_to_number there is exactf declared but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/11/2011 08:40 AM, Ivan Raikov wrote:
Good point, I did not think to check where these eggs are hosted. So
here is the revised list; I have marked the eggs not hosted on
call-cc.org with an asterisk (*) and I advise their respective
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:24:45PM +0200, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Peter,
I've got one more issue fixed wrt. the fix I posted recently
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2011-10/txtQD3AT30Qxp.txt
Since I'm recovering from a big mess I made out of my build envt.
Here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As some of you may recall, some time ago I grumbled about the rather
hodgepodge state of eggs still running on older versions of chicken -
despite the likes of 4.5.0 being widely deployed by package managers. My
main fear is that prospective Chicken
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:05:55PM +0100, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote:
The user-agent strings it generates look like:
chicken-install 4.7.0.3-st linux x86-64
Rather than the previous:
chicken-install 4.5.0
I think we should include the operating system version as well as
the operating
Ok, I will not touch those then. Thanks,
-Ivan
Alaric Snell-Pym ala...@snell-pym.org.uk writes:
Eggs in Uncategorized or invalid category:
aes - Cryptography
crypto-tools - Cryptography
I've done these, just not tagged a new version yet, so it's still
showing them as invalid! (I
On 08/10/11 8:29 AM, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
Mario Domenech Goulartmario.goul...@gmail.com wrote:
Should I try to adopt the patch from ticket 526 to the latest sources
and repeat the test? I will if this will push the things forward (this
will happen tomorrow though).
I'd suggest the patch
13 matches
Mail list logo
