How do I do the equivalent of pg:query-for-each with the new api? It must
be simple but I am confused. Any kind soul willing to point me in the right
direction?
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 01:38:19AM +0100, Thomas Chust wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 18:23 -0600, Alan Post wrote:
[...]
(pretty-print (let ((s (amb 0 1 2))) (amb-collect s)))
[...]
produces:
[...]
(0)
[...]
Hello,
to me this behaviour looks correct. amb-collect is supposed
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Alan Post alanp...@sunflowerriver.orgwrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 01:38:19AM +0100, Thomas Chust wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 18:23 -0600, Alan Post wrote:
[...]
(pretty-print (let ((s (amb 0 1 2))) (amb-collect s)))
[...]
produces:
[...]
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 11:42:44PM -0700, Matt Welland wrote:
How do I do the equivalent of pg:query-for-each with the new api? It must
be simple but I am confused. Any kind soul willing to point me in the
right
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:34:14AM -0700, Matt Welland wrote:
Yup, I think that is what I want. Once I saw your example it became
apparent that (query ...) is similar to prepare in the perl dbi api,
however I think I was confused since the paragraph describing query also
mentions prepare. As
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:18:29AM -0700, Matt Welland wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Alan Post
[1]alanp...@sunflowerriver.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 01:38:19AM +0100, Thomas Chust wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 18:23 -0600, Alan Post wrote:
[...]
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:05:19PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
On Mar 19 2012, Alan Post wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:18:29AM -0700, Matt Welland wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Alan Post
A local-to-me ecologist is interested in sitting down and
brainstorming, I hope
