Re: [Chicken-users] Bug with #!optional in Chicken 4.8.0

2012-10-14 Thread Felix
From: John Croisant j...@croisant.net Subject: [Chicken-users] Bug with #!optional in Chicken 4.8.0 Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 20:34:26 -0400 In Chicken 4.8.0, procedures defined with #!optional no longer signal an exception if invoked with too many arguments. For example: (define (foo x

Re: [Chicken-users] Bug with #!optional in Chicken 4.8.0

2012-10-14 Thread Jörg F . Wittenberger
On Oct 14 2012, Felix wrote: From: John Croisant j...@croisant.net Subject: [Chicken-users] Bug with #!optional in Chicken 4.8.0 Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 20:34:26 -0400 In Chicken 4.8.0, procedures defined with #!optional no longer signal an exception if invoked with too many arguments. For

Re: [Chicken-users] Bug with #!optional in Chicken 4.8.0

2012-10-14 Thread John Croisant
On 10/14/12 7:20 AM, Felix wrote: From: John Croisant j...@croisant.net Subject: [Chicken-users] Bug with #!optional in Chicken 4.8.0 Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 20:34:26 -0400 In Chicken 4.8.0, procedures defined with #!optional no longer signal an exception if invoked with too many arguments. For