[Chicken-users] Understanding -block optimization

2013-03-24 Thread Jörg F . Wittenberger
Trying to use -block optimization fails for me badly. I have a module, which is very simple - Scheme wise. It's an interface to offload C-call to pthreads (code here: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2010-01/msg00046.html ). For it's simplicity I picked that one to try the

[Chicken-users] to uses or not to uses

2013-03-24 Thread Jörg F . Wittenberger
After maintaining a codebase for a couple of years, I ended up having all my code converted into modules (while in the beginning there where no modules, just units). During the transition I learned that I still need to maintain the (uses ...) clauses as they where before. Now I wanted to kick

Re: [Chicken-users] to uses or not to uses

2013-03-24 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:05:49PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote: For some reason, several - though not all - procedures turn out to be undefined (e.g. resolve to an unbound value and then segfault accordingly). Segfaults should only happen if aggressive optimizations are enabled. To

Re: [Chicken-users] to uses or not to uses

2013-03-24 Thread Moritz Heidkamp
Jörg F. Wittenberger joerg.wittenber...@softeyes.net writes: Now I wanted to kick out need to keep duplicates of the requirements; once in the uses cluse and below in the import list. Can give an example of what you refer to as import list? Moritz