Re: [Chicken-users] hato multipart/alternative

Hi, When specifying your own multiple Content-Type, you need to include the boundary: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=xyzzy Boundary: xyzzy [Ideally it should infer the boundary in this case, and it would also be nice to automatically generate the boundary when

Re: [Chicken-users] hato multipart/alternative

Hi, You can log issues on hato.googlecode.com http://hato.googlecode.com. If it's a bug I'll try to fix it, but feature requests will largely be pending the port to R7RS. current-rfc-2822-date-string seems to generate the wrong thing on my machine. I'm currently in BST (GMT+1) but

Re: [Chicken-users] hato multipart/alternative

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Andy Bennett andy...@ashurst.eu.orgwrote: Hi, When specifying your own multiple Content-Type, you need to include the boundary: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=xyzzy Boundary: xyzzy [Ideally it should infer the boundary in this