Re: [Chicken-users] Building 32-bit chicken scheme on OS X

2013-07-15 Thread Jim Ursetto
Thanks. Nicholas confirmed 32-bit Macs work so I'm going to officially release 4.8.0.4. Jim On Jul 15, 2013, at 11:12 PM, "Daniel P. Wright" wrote: > Hello, > > 2013/7/16 Jim Ursetto > I put the tarball here: > http://3e8.org/pub/chicken/stability-tmp/chicken-4.8.0.3-b39ebad.tar.gz > > Tha

Re: [Chicken-users] Building 32-bit chicken scheme on OS X

2013-07-15 Thread Daniel P. Wright
Hello, 2013/7/16 Jim Ursetto > I put the tarball here: > http://3e8.org/pub/chicken/stability-tmp/chicken-4.8.0.3-b39ebad.tar.gz Thanks! > On Jul 15, 2013, at 5:56 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote: > > > Hi there. > > > > The culprit appears to be a bug in our use of sigsetjmp, which is > actually alr

Re: [Chicken-users] Building 32-bit chicken scheme on OS X

2013-07-15 Thread Nicholas Van Horn
I can confirm that stability/4.8.0 does build on 32-bit Mac (using the default `make PLATFORM=macosx`). I'm using the same machine (original Core Duo running OS X 10.6.8) that was failing to build the current stability release. Thanks for following up on our #chicken conversation! Nick (pinkiesOu

Re: [Chicken-users] Building 32-bit chicken scheme on OS X

2013-07-15 Thread Jim Ursetto
I put the tarball here: http://3e8.org/pub/chicken/stability-tmp/chicken-4.8.0.3-b39ebad.tar.gz On Jul 15, 2013, at 5:56 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote: > Hi there. > > The culprit appears to be a bug in our use of sigsetjmp, which is actually > already fixed in recent stability/4.8.0 (after 4.8.0.3) b

Re: [Chicken-users] Building 32-bit chicken scheme on OS X

2013-07-15 Thread Jim Ursetto
Hi there. The culprit appears to be a bug in our use of sigsetjmp, which is actually already fixed in recent stability/4.8.0 (after 4.8.0.3) but is as yet unreleased. I verified 32-bit builds now work on a 64-bit Mac. If anyone has a 32-bit Mac (for example, an original Core Duo) could you ver