Hi,
With the following in m.scm:
-
(module m
(do-something)
(import chicken scheme)
(use posix)
(define process (make-parameter 'hello))
(define (do-something)
(printf Doing something...\n))
)
-
...and compiled thusly:
csc -s -O2 -d1 m.scm -j m -o m.so
csc -s m.import.scm
Hi,
I get the wrong binding for process when I (use m):
-
#;1 (use m)
; loading ./m.import.so ...
; loading ./m.so ...
#;2 (process)
hello
-
Of course... I was expecting the posix unit's binding for process:
-
#;1 (use posix)
; loading library posix ...
#;2 process
Hi,
i have found that on some numbers iset-intersection produce wrong results.
example in attachment, all numbers in fixnum range
iset b a:(44189 50194 78574 80802 80902 88559 89629 89832 89862 90701
91234 92306 93599 95409 95687 96350 97827 97844 97845 97846 97847 97848
850 97851 97852 97853
Hi Andy, all.
I looked into this recently since it also seemed like a bug to me, but
the behavior seems to be intentional judging from the code.
A workaround is to exclude `process` from the import list in `m` (as in
`(import (except posix ...))`) -- this prevents the behavior you're
seeing, at
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 06:51:10AM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
It seems to me that when `##sys#alias-global-hook` is used to resolve
names for `set!` forms, it should be called with the bare
(pre-se-lookup) identifier, and when `assign` is true and you're
currently in a module it should always
