Re: [Chicken-users] bug update-uri in uri-common

2014-06-07 Thread John Cowan
Peter Bex scripsit: > c) The port should not be reset, but the uri should be printed without > port if it's the default for this scheme. +1 for (c). -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowanco...@ccil.org Is a chair finely made tragic or comic? Is the portrait of Mona Lisa g

Re: [Chicken-users] [Chicken-announce] [ANN] CHICKEN 4.9.0.1 has been released [was: Re: [ANN] CHICKEN 4.9.0 has been released]

2014-06-07 Thread Peter Bex
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 04:06:51PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: > The tarball is available in the usual location: > http://code.call-cc.org/releases/4.9.0.1/chicken-4.9.0.1.tar.gz Of course that URL should be http://code.call-cc.org/releases/4.9.0/chicken-4.9.0.1.tar.gz Kind regards, The CHICKEN Team

[Chicken-users] [ANN] CHICKEN 4.9.0.1 has been released [was: Re: [Chicken-announce] [ANN] CHICKEN 4.9.0 has been released]

2014-06-07 Thread Peter Bex
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 05:35:01PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: > Dear CHICKEN users, > > We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CHICKEN 4.9.0 > at the following URL: > http://code.call-cc.org/releases/4.9.0/chicken-4.9.0.tar.gz Dear CHICKEN users, It has been pointed out that 4.9.0

Re: [Chicken-users] bug update-uri in uri-common

2014-06-07 Thread Peter Bex
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:18:14AM +0200, Kristian Lein-Mathisen wrote: > I realize I already put down my vote, but I'd like to promote my case after > some thought. I guess what we're trying to find out is what's more > troublesome and/or surprising: > > 1. having to set the port explicitly (to #