Hello Alex
03.10.2014 19:44, alex пишет:
That's pretty dope. Thanks for sharing that.
What was the most wonderful thing you experienced? What was the most
dangerous?
--Alex
Functional programming with FFI and set!ters really powerful, but some
time its not working as expected and look co
Christian Kellermann scripsit:
> -R foo is basically saying (require-extension foo) at toplevel, so the
> problem of making the definitions available at compile time remain.
There probably should be a csc option to do this. I thought that -X
would, but it doesn't.
--
John Cowan http:/
Sascha Ziemann writes:
> 2014-10-06 15:53 GMT+02:00 Peter Bex :
>
>> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 03:44:38PM +0200, Sascha Ziemann wrote:
>> > Error: during expansion of (curtain ...) - unbound variable:
>> > blowfish#make-blowfish-encryptor
>>
>> You can do (begin-for-syntax (require-extension blowfi
2014-10-06 15:53 GMT+02:00 Peter Bex :
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 03:44:38PM +0200, Sascha Ziemann wrote:
> > Error: during expansion of (curtain ...) - unbound variable:
> > blowfish#make-blowfish-encryptor
>
> You can do (begin-for-syntax (require-extension blowfish)) to make
>
Thanks! This help
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 03:44:38PM +0200, Sascha Ziemann wrote:
> But when I try to compile it I get an error:
>
> $ csc -R blowfish -ss curtain.scm
>
> Error: during expansion of (curtain ...) - unbound variable:
> blowfish#make-blowfish-encryptor
> I am wondering why the blowfish function is u
Hi,
I have a simple program using the blowfish egg in a macro to do some
obscurity:
(require-extension blowfish)
(define-syntax curtain
(ir-macro-transformer
(lambda (form inject compare?)
(let* ((str (cadr form))
(len (string-length str))
(pad (make-string
