Re: [Chicken-users] iconv egg patch

2015-08-12 Thread Peter Bex
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:20:04PM -0300, Hugo Arregui wrote: > > I am afraid that the iconv egg is orphaned at the moment. Would you like > > to take care of it? > > Sure!. I cannot access the svn repo mentioned in the egg source, so I > guess I should use the result of chicken-install -r as the

Re: [Chicken-users] iconv egg patch

2015-08-12 Thread Hugo Arregui
> I am afraid that the iconv egg is orphaned at the moment. Would you like > to take care of it? Sure!. I cannot access the svn repo mentioned in the egg source, so I guess I should use the result of chicken-install -r as the base, isn't that? Regards, Hugo signature.asc Description: OpenPGP d

[Chicken-users] I've gots an egg: missing.egg

2015-08-12 Thread Alexej Magura
Hey, I've got a new egg that I'm working on: https://github.com/amagura/eggs/tree/master/staging/missing/trunk Is hosting on the chicken-eggs svn repo discouraged against for new eggs? If it isn't then I'd like to use the svn repo as a means of managing the egg: I use the git repo as an auxil

Re: [Chicken-users] do* code-review

2015-08-12 Thread Alexej Magura
lulz, nevermind. xD On 08/12/2015 04:07 PM, Alexej Magura wrote: Could I please get a code review on this function: I didn't write it, but even if I had, I'd still want some of yall to look over it just to make sure that it's as efficient and performant as far as getting as much work done as

[Chicken-users] do* code-review

2015-08-12 Thread Alexej Magura
Could I please get a code review on this function: I didn't write it, but even if I had, I'd still want some of yall to look over it just to make sure that it's as efficient and performant as far as getting as much work done as possible with as little effort as possible: efficient, essentially,

Re: [Chicken-users] sequential version of set!

2015-08-12 Thread Kon Lovett
> On Aug 12, 2015, at 4:50 AM, Alexej Magura wrote: > > Is there a sequential version of set!, as in setq? See http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/4/moremacros#stiff-set > ___ > Chicken-users mailing list > Chicken-users@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.

Re: [Chicken-users] sequential version of set!

2015-08-12 Thread John Cowan
Alexej Magura scripsit: > Is there a sequential version of /set!/, as in /setq/? There isn't, though it would be straightforward to write a macro. Scheme doesn't put as much emphasis on mutation as Common Lisp does; note that while `do` looks the same in Scheme as in Common Lisp, it does not muta

[Chicken-users] sequential version of set!

2015-08-12 Thread Alexej Magura
Is there a sequential version of /set!/, as in /setq/? ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

[Chicken-users] versions patch

2015-08-12 Thread Alexej Magura
Adds the following functions to the `versions' egg: (define (local egg) (irregex-replace (format "~%") (last (string-split (call-with-input-pipe (string-append "chicken-status " egg) read-all) (define (remote egg #!optional url)