Re: [Chicken-users] Windows deployment - Numbers egg

2015-10-04 Thread Robert Herman
Matt, I tried -deploy, -deploy -static, -static combinations. "csc -deploy -static Pi-Ch.scm" creates a deploy directory, and the resulting executable is 1.6MB vs 77KB, but it still throws the "cannot the load the extension: numbers". I then tried putting libchicken.dll in the deploy directory

Re: [Chicken-users] Windows deployment - Numbers egg

2015-10-04 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 10:51:49PM +0800, Robert Herman wrote: > Whoa! Hold on. When I ran "csc -deploy Pi-Ch.scm" it created a 77kb exe > Pi-Ch.exe in a newly-created directory, Pi-Ch. When I look at the command > line information, I found this error: > >

Re: [Chicken-users] Windows deployment - Numbers egg

2015-10-04 Thread Robert Herman
Yes, I read the manual. All of the examples seem to be a linux host with .so files. Windows uses .dll files. When I try to deploy a static build of the exe, it makes an exe, and the size makes you think it has bundled any dependencies like numbers (from 77kb to 1.6mb), but on MinGW64-32 bit, it

Re: [Chicken-users] Hypergiant egg install fails, and some other eggs

2015-10-04 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 10:50:24AM -0600, Jeremy Steward wrote: > I suppose as one of the few people who has used / uses CHICKEN on > Windows I should chime in :) Thanks for this! > On 02/10/15 12:57 PM, Peter Bex wrote: > > The reason behind this seems to be that Blas itself is a bit of an > >

Re: [Chicken-users] Windows deployment - Numbers egg

2015-10-04 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 08:50:59PM +0800, Robert Herman wrote: > Matt, > > "csc -deploy -static Pi-Ch.scm" creates a deploy directory, and the > resulting executable is 1.6MB vs 77KB, but it still throws the "cannot the > load the extension: numbers". > > I then tried putting libchicken.dll in

Re: [Chicken-users] Windows deployment - Numbers egg

2015-10-04 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 10:23:26PM +0800, Robert Herman wrote: > Yes, I read the manual. All of the examples seem to be a linux host with > .so files. Windows uses .dll files. Hi again Robert, This is of course true, but the .so files that CHICKEN generates on mingw are just misnamed .dll-files.

Re: [Chicken-users] Windows deployment - Numbers egg

2015-10-04 Thread Robert Herman
Whoa! Hold on. When I ran "csc -deploy Pi-Ch.scm" it created a 77kb exe Pi-Ch.exe in a newly-created directory, Pi-Ch. When I look at the command line information, I found this error: C:\Users\Robert\Desktop\Chicken-IUP-Examples\Pi>csc -deploy Pi-Ch.scm The system cannot find the file specified.

Re: [Chicken-users] Hypergiant egg install fails, and some other eggs

2015-10-04 Thread Jeremy Steward
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I suppose as one of the few people who has used / uses CHICKEN on Windows I should chime in :) On 02/10/15 12:57 PM, Peter Bex wrote: > On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 02:29:35AM +0800, Robert Herman wrote: >> Maybe Termbox is too reliant on a linux terminal

Re: [Chicken-users] Hypergiant egg install fails, and some other eggs

2015-10-04 Thread Jeremy Steward
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/10/15 11:09 AM, Peter Bex wrote: > On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 10:50:24AM -0600, Jeremy Steward wrote: >> I suppose as one of the few people who has used / uses CHICKEN >> on Windows I should chime in :) > > Thanks for this! > >> On 02/10/15 12:57

Re: [Chicken-users] Windows deployment - Numbers egg

2015-10-04 Thread Robert Herman
Peter, Thank you, that explains everything I was confused about! The only issue remaining is the error with the compile deploy process trying to copy files from the CHICKEN directory. I didn't rename the CHICKEN directory to CHICKEN-IUP, that's what the pre-built binary for Windows with IUP

Re: [Chicken-users] Windows deployment - Numbers egg

2015-10-04 Thread John Cowan
Peter Bex scripsit: > On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 10:23:26PM +0800, Robert Herman wrote: > > Yes, I read the manual. All of the examples seem to be a linux host with > > .so files. Windows uses .dll files. > > Hi again Robert, > > This is of course true, but the .so files that CHICKEN generates on