Re: [Chicken-users] New egg: hopefully

2015-12-18 Thread Sudarshan S Chawathe
I cannot seem to access this egg. 'chicken-install' doesn't know about it (yet?) which didn't surprise me too much, but I also get HTTP 404 errors when using the link to the source from the egg's doc page on call-cc.org (and ditto for the link on the askemos.org page):

Re: [Chicken-users] This may be a bug in chickens hash tables - or my bad

2015-12-18 Thread John Cowan
Ivan Shmakov scripsit: > Given that the basic idea of hashing is to produce a key out of > the object’s /value/, the change of the value – and mutation > does just that – changes the hash. Well, yes and no. SRFI 69 and other Scheme hash table frameworks support at least two

Re: [Chicken-users] New egg: hopefully

2015-12-18 Thread Jörg F . Wittenberger
Am 18.12.2015 um 17:41 schrieb Sudarshan S Chawathe: > > I cannot seem to access this egg. 'chicken-install' doesn't know about > it (yet?) which didn't surprise me too much, but I also get HTTP 404 > errors when using the link to the source from the egg's doc page on > call-cc.org (and ditto

Re: [Chicken-users] This may be a bug in chickens hash tables - or my bad

2015-12-18 Thread Jörg F . Wittenberger
Am 18.12.2015 um 18:35 schrieb John Cowan: > Ivan Shmakov scripsit: > >> Given that the basic idea of hashing is to produce a key out of >> the object’s /value/, the change of the value – and mutation >> does just that – changes the hash. > > Well, yes and no. SRFI 69 and other

Re: [Chicken-users] New egg: hopefully

2015-12-18 Thread Sudarshan S Chawathe
Thanks for the updated pointer to the source. I installed the egg in the usual way ('chicken-install' in the directory with the source files) but could not run the included test (test/run.scm) successfully, although csc compiles it fine. (Details below.) In interactive use, I get an error: