Hi Chickeneers,
yesterday I found that simply having a (use mailbox) in some code had a
huge impact (more than a factor of 3) at the performance of the
resulting executable. Without using the mailbox stuff at all.
Meanwhile I figured out that this has nothing at all to do with the
mailbox egg.
* Christian Kellermann [160113 21:44]:
> * Jörg F. Wittenberger [160113 12:38]:
> > yesterday I found that simply having a (use mailbox) in some code had a
> > huge impact (more than a factor of 3) at the performance of the
> > resulting
* Jörg F. Wittenberger [160113 12:38]:
> yesterday I found that simply having a (use mailbox) in some code had a
> huge impact (more than a factor of 3) at the performance of the
> resulting executable. Without using the mailbox stuff at all.
>
> Meanwhile I
IIRC, there's been ongoing efforts to remove SRFI-1 from core; which may
explain your observations regarding Master.
Perhaps you should consider asking Chicken Hackers?
-Dan
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
Original Message
From: Jörg F. Wittenberger
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016
Hi Dan & chicken-hackers,
thanks for your reply. I'm really curious how to explain these findings.
Complying with your suggestion, I'm sending this time to chicken-hackers
this time too. I've been hoping enough of them would read chicken-users
too.
For reference to those who missed the