Re: [Chicken-users] set! on unbound variable

2016-09-24 Thread Dan Leslie
Particularly since Chicken is in the minority of Schemes that allow this behaviour. I'm not a fan of fast-and-loose binding and typing, personally; it's a source of too many mistakes. -Dan On 2016-09-24 5:14 PM, Derrell Piper wrote: > I agree that it's allowed but it would an optional warning

Re: [Chicken-users] set! on unbound variable

2016-09-24 Thread Derrell Piper
I agree that it's allowed but it would an optional warning would be very nice. ___ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users

Re: [Chicken-users] set! on unbound variable

2016-09-24 Thread John Cowan
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Dan Leslie wrote: > It seems that Chicken has a parameter to enforce R5RS strictness: > > > -r5rs-syntax disables the Chicken extensions to R5RS syntax > All that does is disable the syntax keywords that are normally available but are not

Re: [Chicken-users] set! on unbound variable

2016-09-24 Thread Dan Leslie
It seems that Chicken has a parameter to enforce R5RS strictness: > -r5rs-syntax disables the Chicken extensions to R5RS syntax So I gave it a shot with this issue: > csi -r5rs-syntax > CHICKEN > (c) 2008-2014, The Chicken Team > (c) 2000-2007, Felix L. Winkelmann > Version 4.9.0.1