Thanks Kristian.
By compiling a file containing only the following statement:
(time (+ 1 1))
We can confirm that the (chicken time posix) module
is included by default.
I will do with generated warning.
Take care,
Mathieu
___
Chicken-users
Hi Mathieu,
I tried (import (except chicken.time time)) and friends (exclude, rename)
without success. I also tried import-syntax. I don't know why it's not
possible to hide this default import from the current namespace.
However, by wrapping the file in a main module (using csc -m main
Hi Mario,
Thanks for helping.
Actually the minimal sample is just that :
source.scm :
(define-record time a b c)
Then running this produces the warning :
$ csc5 source.scm
Warning: (source.scm:1) - assignment to syntax `time'
It looks like csi5 is cool with that statement
Hi Mathieu,
On Sun, 12 May 2019 20:52:47 + Mathieu wrote:
> Hello Schemers,
>
> When I compile the following code :
>
> (define-record time hour minute)
>
> And compile in version 5 like so :
>
> csc5 source.scm
>
> I get the following warning :
>
> assigment to syntax `time'
>
> A clean
Hello Schemers,
When I compile the following code :
(define-record time hour minute)
And compile in version 5 like so :
csc5 source.scm
I get the following warning :
assigment to syntax `time'
A clean build would make be happy.
I think the clash is caused by the time
macro from
Hi Jeronimo,
On Sun, 12 May 2019 08:37:50 -0300 Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 08:52:13AM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
>> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 08:28:23PM -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I am compiling it for wireless routers, and so far I could not
Hello,
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 09:18:16AM +0200, Kristian Lein-Mathisen wrote:
> Perhaps an option would be to cross-compile CHICKEN for your target, and
> run chicken-install with that? That should give you the eggs as shared libs
> for your target, which you could simply copy over. That'd
Hi Peter,
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 08:52:13AM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 08:28:23PM -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am compiling it for wireless routers, and so far I could not yet
> > package csc -- so getting modules with chicken-install doesn't
> >
Peter Bex wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 11:10:51AM +0200, Marco Maggi wrote:
> If you're interested in this, perhaps you find this blog post of mine
> useful: https://www.more-magic.net/posts/internals-data-representation.html
> It explains how values are represented in memory at the low
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 11:10:51AM +0200, Marco Maggi wrote:
> Ciao,
>
> sorry for peeking under the skirt; I'm trying to get a basic
> understanding of the core usage and memory layout of Scheme values
Hi Marco,
If you're interested in this, perhaps you find this blog post of
Ciao,
sorry for peeking under the skirt; I'm trying to get a basic
understanding of the core usage and memory layout of Scheme values; is
it correct that:
* We can use ##sys#setislot to store any immediate value in a Scheme
vector?
* We can use the system operations
Perhaps an option would be to cross-compile CHICKEN for your target, and
run chicken-install with that? That should give you the eggs as shared libs
for your target, which you could simply copy over. That'd require a C
compiler for your target on your host, though.
K.
On Sun, May 12, 2019, 9:01
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 08:28:23PM -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if it is possible to remove or add modules to
> the list of default included modules that come with Chicken.
>
> I am compiling it for wireless routers, and so far I could not yet
> package csc --
13 matches
Mail list logo
