On Sun 22 Nov 2020 09:15:46 AM +01, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
>
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:40:21 -0800 wrote:
>>
>> Should we keep this documentation?
>
> I think it should be removed.
Done.
>> If SRFI-87 is not an egg and if there's no explicit support of SRFI-87
>> in chicken, how was I able
Since the content of SRFI-87 is built in to the current Chicken, #:srfi-87
should be added to the output of `features` in (chicken-platform).
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 3:16 AM Mario Domenech Goulart
wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:40:21 -0800 wrote:
>
> > On Sat 21 Nov 2020 09:28:10 PM +01, Mario
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 18:44:10 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote:
> I would like to submit a new egg for publication:
>
> SRFI-94: Type-Restricted Numerical Functions
>
> Its documentation is here:
>
> https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/srfi-94
>
> Its release-info is here:
>
> https://github.com
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:13:57 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote:
> I would like to submit a new egg for publication:
>
> SRFI-132: Sort Libraries
>
> Its documentation is here:
>
> https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/srfi-132
>
> Its release-info is here:
>
> https://github.com/diamond-lizard/srf
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:40:21 -0800 wrote:
> On Sat 21 Nov 2020 09:28:10 PM +01, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
>>
>> The support for `=>' in cond clauses has been added [to CHICKEN 4.9.0]
>> to conform to R7RS, not exactly to support SRFI-87, as far as I can
>> tell. It is documented in
>> http:/
