>
>
> The compilation options enable instrumentation-based profiling. There's
> statistical profiling available when running executables with -:p which
> might give you more useful data (see
> https://www.more-magic.net/posts/statistical-profiling.html for more
> infomation). Could you please try
Hello Mark,
> You'll have to bear with me here, as I haven't tried adding profiling
> before.
>
> I think I've got it done, but it only outputs at the function level, and
> the profile between the two platforms just seems to mirror a general
> difference in being slower on one platform.
The
>
> That performance discrepancy is kinda surprising, specially considering
> that Linux is running as a guest on a VM on Windows.
>
> Maybe profiling can help spot what is causing the performance
> difference?
>
You'll have to bear with me here, as I haven't tried adding profiling
before.
I
Mario Domenech Goulart writes:
> That performance discrepancy is kinda surprising, specially considering
> that Linux is running as a guest on a VM on Windows.
But to what libraries is Chicken linked in each case? That could be the
source of the discrepancy (does Chicken link to
Hi Mark,
On Mon, 6 Sep 2021 13:26:26 +0100 Mark Fisher wrote:
> I've got a windows and linux environment for Chicken on the same machine.
> linux is running in VMWare Workstation, the host is Windows 10.
>
> I'm seeing quite a difference in performance between the two; windows host is
>
I have a question related to this. Wasn't there a Chicken-Scheme once that
used the Microsoft language tool chain?
I could be mistaken.
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 8:29 AM Mark Fisher wrote:
> I've got a windows and linux environment for Chicken on the same machine.
> linux is running in VMWare
I've got a windows and linux environment for Chicken on the same machine.
linux is running in VMWare Workstation, the host is Windows 10.
I'm seeing quite a difference in performance between the two; windows host
is running about ~4-6x slower than a VM that's running on the same machine.
The
