> 7.558s CPU time, 0/225861 GCs (major/minor), maximum live heap: 30.78 MiB
> 8.839s CPU time, 0/256410 GCs (major/minor), maximum live heap: 30.78 MiB
>
>[...]
>
> It would be great to get some help or explanation with this issue.
Hi!
I have similar timings and the difference in the number of
Hi Christian,
this might be a case of "never trust a statistics you did not falsify
yourself".
Not bothering to speculate about explanations, I tend to ask how stable
the results are wrt. larger N's, repetition etc.
IMHO the results are too close for a call. Roughly this looks like 91%
memory
Hi Ariela,
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 17:18:45 -0300 Ariela Wenner wrote:
> So, here's a followup
>
> I linked pthreads and added the things you suggested to the wiki.
>
> As for the hangs, I hate to say this but it seems like the test was the
> problem.
> More precisely, it seems like the topic for
On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 12:52:50 + "Caolan McMahon" wrote:
>> Caolan: would you be ok for you if cmark for CHICKEN 5 points to
>> Harley's implementation?
>
> Yes, please go ahead - and thanks to Harley for creating a CHICKEN 5 version
> :)
Thanks, Caolan.
Harley: thanks again. Your egg has
Dear All,
I am currently experimenting with Chicken Scheme and I would like to ask about
the following situation: I am comparing a "pure" Scheme fused-multiply-add
(fma) using chicken.flonum against C99's fma via chicken.foreign. Here is my
test code:
fma-test.scm
(import (chicken
> Caolan: would you be ok for you if cmark for CHICKEN 5 points to
> Harley's implementation?
Yes, please go ahead - and thanks to Harley for creating a CHICKEN 5 version :)
Caolan
On Thu, 04 Nov 2021 01:14:13 + "Harley Swick"
wrote:
> Mario,
>
> Looks like I missed a step. I have added a release-info file and tested it
> with test-new-egg.
>
> Jim,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I have updated the wiki with your suggestions.
Thanks, Harley.
Let's just double-check
