On Nov 14, 2007 4:05 PM, Ivan Shmakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could the server be configured to send
Content-Type: application/emacs-lisp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: gzip
instead of
Content-Type: application/x-gzip
so that browsers will allow to see the
A new release 0.3 of scheme-complete.el is available at
http://synthcode.com/emacs/scheme-complete.el
It includes many bugfixes, and now works out of the box
in GNU Emacs 21 and 22, and XEmacs 21.
New features include smarter inference by determining
variable types bound in LET, as well as a
Hi,
On Nov 4, 2007 12:02 AM, Peter Busser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm writing a number of test cases using the test egg. I would like to use
the test program for automated testing. Is it possible to know that one of
the tests failed, so I can exit the program with an error value?
I was
On Nov 4, 2007 12:02 AM, Peter Busser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm writing a number of test cases using the test egg. I would like to use
the test program for automated testing. Is it possible to know that one of
the tests failed, so I can exit the program with an error value?
OK, I just
scheme-complete.el is a single function that can be used with any
Emacs scheme mode. It provides real-time, lexical-scope aware
type inferencing tab-completion for any R5RS scheme, with
extensibility for implementation-specific features (currently only
Chicken and Gauche are customized).
For
On 7/7/07, Alex Shinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, fmt hangs on the obvious solution:
(fmt #t
(join
(lambda (x) (trim 5 x))
(string-split foo foo\nbar bar\n \n)
nl))
That's a bug. I've fixed it in my repository, and will
probably make a new release
Hi,
On 7/7/07, Robin Lee Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hoo-boy the problems I've had with fmt. :( It seems to be lovely
in general, but it really doesn't want to do what I want, which is:
Thanks for using fmt! Please be aware this is the very first release
and I'm still working on it.
On 6/27/07, Arto Bendiken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First, the `regex-literals' egg [2] provides precompiled regular
expression literals of the
form `#/[a-z0-9]+/i', the Perl-like #/.../[ixu] syntax sure to be
instantly familiar to most everyone:
Neat!
Not sure if you did this intentionally
Hi all,
Following up on trac ticket #258:
http://trac.callcc.org/ticket/258
I'm considering changing the utf8 egg to no longer use syntax-case
modules, so that it would work like the numbers egg.
The way this would work is that, naturally, if you wanted to use utf8
semantics you'd just (use
Hi,
On 6/19/07, Jong-Hyouk Yun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I found some problem with utf8 egg and string-split.
[...]
AFTER: string-split failure.
#;4 (string-split foo bar)
Error: (string-split) bad argument type - not a string: #f
Thanks for spotting this! I've fixed it and added
On 6/18/07, Graham Fawcett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our 300th egg has arrived, and we have randomly selected a winner from
the candidate pool. I'm very happy to announce that the winner is Alex
Shinn.
Yay! I'm honored to receive a Chicken T-shirt :)
I'd also be happy to fund the next shirt
On 6/18/07, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should there be bugs, or if the code generated is too big, compiler macros
(which implement this feature) can be disabled via the
-disable-compiler-macros
option to chicken/csc.
Nice! I've been wanting compiler macros for a while :)
Hi all,
There's an alternative to the gettext egg now available
as free-gettext (http://chicken.wiki.br/free-gettext) for
those of you who choose to avoid linking to GPL libraries,
or who want a more flexible and powerful internationalization
tool.
--
Alex
Hi,
On 4/19/07, Andre Kuehne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes i know. It works as you described it. Although there are some
packages which have no version information, so these would get
reinstalled.
Unfortunately that's true for some older packages, but hopefully these
will be updated soon.
I
On 4/19/07, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07, Andre Kuehne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone
I was wondering if it's appropriate/saver to reinstall all eggs after a
chicken upgrade
and if there is an easy way to do this, so that i don't have to manually run
Hi,
On 4/19/07, Andre Kuehne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently chicken-setup -l gives you all module-names like array-lib-ec
, array-lib-hof, etc., so this is nothing you can easily
pass back to
chicken-setup.
That's true, but the command wasn't using the -l option, but
On 3/16/07, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone who actually understands Scheme macros and
comprehensions take a look at this? Thanks a bunch,
I won't touch SRFI-42, but if you'd use it I'll provide a SRFI-4
extension to loopy-loop :)
--
Alex
Hi,
On 2/7/07, minh thu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I Don't Like About Callbacks.
a) Putted simply, you can't mix gui events with
application specific events.
b) (which is related) Since a function call results
from an event, you can't generate an event whose
callback needs the end of
the
On 12/5/06, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Alex Shinn has written a hygienic pattern matching package, mostly
compatible to Chicken's default matching stuff
You need this whenever you want to mix MATCH with hygienic
macros, or things will break quickly.
Just replace
(use
On 11/28/06, Alex Shinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/06, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This announces the availability of loopy-loop,
Alex Shinn's lightweight, elegant and customizable looping
construct (syntax-case only).
Better documentation will be forthcoming shortly
On 11/28/06, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This announces the availability of loopy-loop,
Alex Shinn's lightweight, elegant and customizable looping
construct (syntax-case only).
Better documentation will be forthcoming shortly!
Questions, comments and suggestions are greatly
On 9/14/06, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/14/06, Matthew Welland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a formal reason why tinyclos can't have its own namespace for
methods? Or, is it just an implementation limitation?
In STklos I was used to doing the following:
(define-class
At Mon, 29 May 2006 03:12:06 -0700 (PDT), Dan wrote:
Just a small observation -- the propensity for long,
complicated URL's isn't a win. Typing the full
www.call/cc.org is a pain; the galinha site is also
not something I can memorize, and the same goes for
the united freaks site.
I like
At Mon, 15 May 2006 08:53:14 +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
I've put together a binary of chicken 2.311.
Since this is the first time I use PackageMaker, I'd be delighted
if someone could verify that the binary works.
Nice! Works for me (OS 10.3.9).
--
Alex
At Sun, 23 Apr 2006 11:08:33 +0200, Peter Busser wrote:
In
this sense, Spiffy is closer to Yaws (http://yaws.hyber.org), a
webserver written in Erlang, and in the following benchmark Yaws is
shown to completely outscale Apache 2.0, handling over 80,000 requests
compared to Apache's
At Sun, 23 Apr 2006 11:15:09 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
Alex Shinn scripsit:
In the absense of any lies^Wstatis^Wbenchmarks, I'd wager Chicken's
thread handling is closer to Erlang than to POSIX threads. And if you
look at the conclusions on that Apache comparison, the author suggests
At Thu, 6 Apr 2006 14:14:26 +0200, Hans Bulfone wrote:
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 02:34:16AM -0500, Alex Shinn wrote:
At Mon, 3 Apr 2006 13:11:05 +0200, Hans Bulfone wrote:
i would have also expected this version to be slightly
faster because read-char doesn't need to be looked up
At Mon, 3 Apr 2006 13:11:05 +0200, Hans Bulfone wrote:
i would have also expected this version to be slightly
faster because read-char doesn't need to be looked up
on every invokation... but it got slightly slower;
can anybody explain why?
Did you change anything else?
--
Alex
At Thu, 30 Mar 2006 02:42:36 +0200, Hans Bulfone wrote:
i'm porting the rfc.mime library from gauche to chicken.
in the library the procedures read-byte, peek-byte and
write-byte are used to read/write bytes which are given
as integers.
at the moment, i'm using
(define (read-byte .
At Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:14:15 -0500, John Cowan wrote:
Is there a procedure that can be invoked to tell a program whether it is
running in the interpreter or as compiled code?
Not a procedure, but you can
(cond-expand
(compiling
...)
(else
...))
--
Alex
At Thu, 23 Mar 2006 08:55:14 +0100, Sunnan wrote:
I want to use the ut8 egg, but when I do it complains that it doesn't
know what import is.
Adding
(require-extension syntax-case)
gets rid of that complaint but then instead it complains about my
tinyclos methods:
This is my preamble:
Hi!
Wishlist: the following definitions are reasonable in a Scheme without
imaginary numbers:
(define (real-part x) x)
(define (imag-part x) 0)
(define magnitude abs)
(define (angle x) 0)
If these were provided in the core it would be easier to write code
that works regardless of
At Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:20:45 +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
On 3/15/06, Topher Cyll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to specify generic methods on values instead of class
in Chicken's tinyclos, like CLOS's (eql value) or Swindle's (singleton
value) or (name = value) forms?
At Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:04:45 +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
On 3/17/06, Alex Shinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately Chicken currently segfaults when you MAKE an inherited
instance of generic:
$ csi -q
#;1 (define x (make-class (list generic) (list)))
#;2 (make x
At Sat, 28 Jan 2006 22:23:37 +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
An alternative would be some interface (web-based, or whatever)
do manage eggs, their status and releases. Oh, and while we're at
it: to-do lists, bug-reports, etc. Now if I just had more time...
I'm not sure if this is of interest
At Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:18:11 +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
Would it be worth improving the lazy-let macro
so that it understands at least let and quote forms?
Not let forms. Analyzing subforms of a macro is called code-walking,
and the first thing you then need to do is sc-expand the body or
At Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:18:00 +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
Does anyone know of any existence of a lazy-let macro,
which does the following?
convert from
[...]
(lazy-let ([a (get-a)][b (get-b)])
(if (condition)
(begin (display a) a)
(begin (display b) b)))
into
(if
At Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:52:21 -0800, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
felix winkelmann wrote:
Hi!
sassy, Jonathan Kraut's x86 assembler is available
as an egg now:
http://www.call-with-current-continuation.org/eggs/sassy.html
I notice it requires libffi. Anyone know how deeply tied
At Wed, 12 Oct 2005 07:35:36 +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
Hm... Works fine on this machine. I'll try it on another tonight.
Can someone else reproduce this problem?
I can:
$ csi -R numbers -eval '(bitwise-and (random (expt 2 64)) (- (expt 2 64) 1))'
*** glibc detected *** double free or
At Thu, 06 Oct 2005 21:56:08 +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
(expt) however is slow for fixnum arithmetic.
I reviewed the Bug in the numbers egg thread again,
understand the background, and am seeking the solution.
It would be nice to have a faster EXPT, but since there have already
been a number
At Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:38:09 -0500, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
Does anyone know of any frameworks to provide i18n for Scheme
programs?
There's a gettext-compatible Gauche module at
http://synthcode.com/scheme/gettext.scm
which is high on my TODO list to port. It provides a full
At Thu, 06 Oct 2005 14:50:18 +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
That is certainly understandable, except that I do not know if
type-checking in scheme code is really slower than type-cheking
in c code, if the scheme code is compiled properly or unsafely. (or inlined?)
# Basically, there should not be
At Tue, 04 Oct 2005 15:43:00 -, Thomas Chust wrote:
I hope I have put it as simply as possible while still being correct...
These are only the procedures that concern themselves with *loading* of
code, though. In addition there are at least two module systems available
for CHICKEN:
At Wed, 28 Sep 2005 17:26:24 -, Thomas Chust wrote:
[...] But instead of binding to libcurl wouldn't it be nicer to
program some convenient interface to OpenSSL instead
I've been wanting this for a while, not just for HTTPS but for Yahoo
Domain key support for the Hato mail server (right
At Mon, 26 Sep 2005 23:42:23 -0400, Raffael Cavallaro wrote:
On Sep 26, 2005, at 1:51 AM, felix winkelmann wrote:
Here a patch for extras.scm:
1493d1492
((##sys#permanent? x) (##core#inline C_hashptr x))
Not to pick nits, but Felix's patch seems to differ somewhat from
At Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:05:06 +0200, Thomas Chust wrote:
#;2 (expt 10 100)
10110891155767964156222877689497504522960006971153529700550125477736178357726682741211136
The docs already note that expt gives incorrect results for exact
numbers. In the meantime you can use something
At Wed, 10 Aug 2005 20:37:21 -0500, Alex Shinn wrote:
(define (power base e) ; like expt but e must be an integer
Might as well go all the way. Attached is a patch to numbers-base.scm
which modifies the above power function to work on any real numbers
and defines the default expt case
At Mon, 1 Aug 2005 14:10:48 -0500, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
As far as I can see, I'm missing support for the following sequences:
~R, ~F, ~E, ~G, ~$, ~, ~|, ~I, ~Y and ~Q.
You may want to look at http://synthcode.com/scheme/cl-format.scm
(Gauche Scheme, should be easily portable). It
At Mon, 1 Aug 2005 21:13:38 -0500, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
It doesn't support ~{, ~;, ~}, ~[, ~^, ~}, right?
Yes, so between the two of us I think we have about everything
covered :)
Would it be okay with you if I take some of the code there and include
it as part of my
201 - 249 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
