On 10/4/07, Jerry van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The build now succeeds, but none of the executables run. (Instruction on
address 0x7c93426d points to address 0x).
However, running under gdb does work so it seems something is still missing.
Sorry, I don't know how to fix this. I
Hi, Shawn!
The problem is that I don't know how to link dlls properly.
The build log you've sent me only generated the static
libs, due to a missing libdl.so (dll, or whatever).
I need to see the exact build steps for a full build with
dynamic linking. The shared lib generation options for
On 10/2/07, Jerry van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, the current trunk is failing again:
|$ ./build.sh
|make -f Makefile.mingw all
|make[1]: Entering directory `/c/Home/src/chicken/trunk'
|gcc chicken-bug.o -o chicken-bug.exe libchicken.a -lm
On 10/2/07, Graham Fawcett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That, I think, is about as minimal as you can get, while still being
robust and being flexible enough to accommodate many protocols and
many app frameworks.
I think the power of personal mini-frameworks is greatly underappreciated.
Truly
Hi, Jerry!
One more question: what's the output of
gcc -dM -E - /dev/null
on your machine?
cheers,
felix
On 10/2/07, Jerry van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kon Lovett writes:
It works w/o the named option w/ MinGW32.
Mingw32 does not offer a build environment so this cannot
On 9/30/07, Jerry van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* To get chicken.info to install the end of line 763 in rules.make should
actually read: --info-file=chicken.info instead of just chicken.info
This doesn't work, at least on Linux (I reverted the current trunk to
the old way of installing
On 9/27/07, Dan Muresan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I understand your annoyance with MSVC, it's nevertheless an
important environment, and I maintain that supporting it lends more
credence to Chicken in the industry. I understand that you do not wish
to spend time on it. I still hope we
On 9/27/07, Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 26, 2007, at 10:48 PM, felix winkelmann wrote:
Yes or no?
See the proplist egg.
Yes, that one does indeed provides an interface to functionally
equivalent stuff. But with real symbol plists, the extraslot becomes
obsolete and access
Hi!
I have added a cygwin platform/target to the current chicken (2.713).
Please give it a try. Since your build somehow didn't create shared
libraries of the runtime, I currently have guessed at the correct
options, so this may fail.
Any feedback is welcome.
cheers
felix
On 9/21/07, Dan Muresan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand why cmake was dropped. Was it hard to maintain
But more importantly, Chicken used to be build-able with MSVC before
cmake, IIRC. What happened to that?
MSVC support is gone. The Microsoft compilers are not particularly
On 9/20/07, Fred Morain-Nicolier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
i try to use the javahack eggs in order to debug java-based programs. I get
confused when trying to create Arrays. I finally find a problem (a bug?) when
sending some expressions to jscheme. Here is an example :
session
On 9/18/07, naruto canada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
my attemp to compile chicken scheme run into -ldl problem:
...
./libchicken.so: undefined reference to `dlerror'
./libchicken.so: undefined reference to `dlclose'
./libchicken.so: undefined reference to `dlopen'
./libchicken.so:
On 9/24/07, naruto canada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/24/07, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/18/07, naruto canada [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
my attemp to compile chicken scheme run into -ldl problem:
...
./libchicken.so: undefined reference to `dlerror
On 9/20/07, Dan Muresan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
what happened to the stable version download? The homepage now says to
go to http://chicken.wiki.br/dev-snapshots/current; the dev-snapshots
part doesn't provide the same assurance as a stable version...
Is there a mailing list thread
On 9/19/07, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg01665.html
Incidentally, gcc distributed with cygwin is actually multi-targeted --
it can produce binaries for two different platforms -- cygwin and
mingw. By default the resulting binary is
On 9/20/07, Dan Muresan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
if I compile x.scm which contains simply
(repl)
with
csc -v -R syntax-case -run-time-macros x.scm
-run-time-macros has no effect with syntax-case. You might as
well compile with csc x.scm.
I get the following error during (repl)
Hi, Terence!
Cygwin is currently not supported by chicken. You are using a
completely invalid build (mingw32?), which is illegal. Expect
law enforcement personnel homing in on you at any time.
cheers,
felix
On 9/18/07, Terrence Brannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp :
On 9/18/07, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/18/07, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What makefile did you use?
Makefile.mingw
Invalid. Wrong. Utterly.
mingw != cygwin.
(and (not (eq? 'mingw 'cygwin))
(not (equal? 'mingw 'cygwin)) )
On 9/18/07, felix
Hi!
Since eggs installed with an older chicken and linked with chicken runtime
libraries created from that older version may throw up all sorts of trouble
on some platforms, the repository pathname (in particular, the number
in $PREFIX/lib/chicken/BUILDVERSION) has been changed to avoid
these
On 9/17/07, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried it. With chicken-2.637, cmake can still generate the
vcproj files if I remove the stuff about chicken.info from
CMakeLists.txt; but it generates a couple warnings. I was
disappointed that it did not generate a makefile for
On 9/18/07, Terrence Brannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp : chicken-setup mathh
The extension mathh does not exist.
Do you want to download it ? (yes/no/abort) [yes]
downloading mathh.egg from (www.call-with-current-continuation.org eggs 80)
gunzip -c ../mathh.egg | tar
What makefile did you use?
cheers,
felix
On 9/17/07, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With cygwin, it helps if I add the flag -mno-cygwin, like this:
C_COMPILER_OPTIONS = -fno-strict-aliasing -mno-cygwin -DHAVE_CHICKEN_CONFIG_H
There is an explanation here:
On 9/18/07, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That link says it can build against either cygwin or mingw. If I do
not use -mno-cygwin, it complains about not finding direct.h.
Depending on the makefile (a piece of information I need before
I can say much more), this may be caused by
On 9/16/07, Todd Ingalls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i built snapshot chicken-2.708 on intel mac, and now every egg i try
to use results in a segmentation fault
(use easyffi)
; loading /usr/local/lib/chicken/1/easyffi.so ...
Segmentation fault
;1 (use loop)
; loading
On 9/16/07, Harri Haataja [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/09/2007, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/13/07, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/13/07, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://chicken.wiki.br/portability
Please consider contributing more
I found a problem with the latest SVN check out of Chicken. chicken-setup
could download and compile extensions all right, but failed when copying
them because the paths passed to the copy command contained both forward-
and back-slashes. I've attached a patch that will, under Windows only,
On 9/13/07, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/13/07, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://chicken.wiki.br/portability
Please consider contributing more information to this page!
I added ARM.
Thanks!
Maybe we should add a column for last version of Chicken which
On 9/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Why do all the following commands produce identical binaries
(using chicken's svn version)?
1. csc -d0 -disable-interrupts -disable-stack-overflow-checks -feature srfi-1
-inline -inline-limit 50 -no-lambda-info -no-trace -O3
Hi!
I've created a page listing the platforms where the current chicken
is confirmed to build and run:
http://chicken.wiki.br/portability
Please consider contributing more information to this page!
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
On 9/13/07, Alex Queiroz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
It seens that the revolution is on the way:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/browse_thread/thread/758f28cdc6058cf6?hl=en
That doesn't actually look too bad: I was somewhat unsure whether to take
that effort
On 9/10/07, Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#;9 ; loading /usr/local/lib/chicken/1/pos.scm ...
Error: (define-syntax) during expansion of (define-syntax ...) -
highlevel macros are not supported
I am of two minds about placing '(use syntax-case)' in syntax files
that only work w/
Hi!
Please take care before doing a make uninstall with recent chicken versions:
the uninstall target would nuke your entire $PREFIX/share !
(this is fixed now, BTW)
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
On 9/7/07, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.exploratorium.edu/cooking/eggs/eggcomposition.html
suggests some more obscure names of things that are inside eggs.
Splendid link, I say! Thanks for this one.
cheers,
felix
___
IHi!
could came up with these, so far:
module (boring)
package
structure (misleading)
library (impossible, due to political reasons, and also misleading)
component (nah...)
enclosure(...)
Has anybody more to suggest?
cheers,
felix
On 9/4/07, Matt Welland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to draw simple polygons etc. in bb but I can't figure out
how. Here is some example code from the web that does the kind of
thing I want to do. Can it be done using bb?
bb has no graphics API, I'm afraid. It wouldn't be too hard to add
On 9/3/07, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if there were a way to keep 32-bit numbers that have
been received from C, store them that way inside the time object, pass
them across s11n that way, and only convert to bignum when you call
(time-second).
You could pass an
On 9/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have a bunch of syntax-case macros that should be available at runtime,
so that eval is able to use them. I'm compiling statically. What is the
simplest way to achieve this?
You first have to create a statically linkable version
On 8/25/07, William Ramsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
When handling a callback with define-external, how do you get it to fall
through.
In other words, I'm watching for a Return keystroke in a dialog box.
If the user
presses a letter key, the key should be passed on to normal data entry.
On 8/28/07, Zbigniew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is strange. What it used to say, at some point, was that the
argument to return had to be wrapped in parentheses, i.e. return(x).
That's because return() itself is a macro which does all the proper
cleanup and calls the current continuation.
On 8/30/07, Benedikt Rosenau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mario,
Try
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/chicken-prefix/lib csi
Thank you, I knew. What I meant is that this should be done
in the setup/install scripts as it was done before. I think
it is better when a system does run after
On 9/1/07, Zbigniew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Felix,
Although I haven't been able to track this down (compilation works for
me), this is the output for Benedikt's ldd:
$ ldd `which csi`
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libchicken.0 = not found
libdl.so.2 =
On 8/23/07, Sunnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
felix winkelmann wrote:
I agree with Benedikt that dependencies should be kept at a minimum.
It starts with simple sharing of code but quickly everything ends up in
a tangle of dependencies that no one can comprehend.
What's the alternative
On 8/23/07, Arto Bendiken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe this is simply a case of a situation where more of the
generally useful stuff should be pushed down to Chicken's standard
library, whence all eggs could rely on that functionality always being
available (unless compiled out e.g.
On 8/23/07, Will M Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For an interesting perspective on this issue (which could probably be
incorporated by minor changes in the egg system), you guys might have
a look at PLT's PLaneT server. You can find a design paper at
On 8/24/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you need to make backward-incompatible changes to the API of an egg,
make a new egg with a new name related to the old. Then persuade people
to change over to the new egg. When you decide to pull support for the
old egg, announce that in
On 8/20/07, Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 20, 2007, at 6:46 AM, Alex Queiroz wrote:
Hallo,
After updating to the latest lookup-table egg, I get seg faults
in chicken-meta-setup check, both in x86 and x86-64 Linux boxes.
I don't. If misc-extn is out-of-date then a
On 8/17/07, Bastian Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ODE uses the following callback:
typedef void dNearCallback (void *data, dGeomID o1, dGeomID o2);
that I interfaced by
(define-foreign-type dNearCallback (function void (c-pointer
dGeomID dGeomID)))
For the collision detection call
so, I put the define-external in graphics.scm, where I do now:
(ode-space-collide space #f (location foobar))
and throws again:
Error: (location) bad argument type - locative can not refer to
objects of this type: #procedure (foobar data81 geom182 geom283)
Does the definition of foobar
On 8/18/07, Bastian Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anonymous functions and even normal ones don't work. How can I get
this to work?
Unfortunately, SWIG does not directly support callbacks. I don't
know how the gtk egg handles this, but you will need to delve into
typemaps for doing the
On 8/20/07, Bastian Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still, the code doesn't work with callback arguments.
It would be very cool if somebody with more knowledge
about scheme, chicken and swig could have a look at this.
Again, safe calls must be used to avoid callbacks from crashing
(check the
On 8/20/07, Bastian Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The code doesn't crash. The callback get's called. That's not the
problem.
Oh, well. Then everything is fine.
What's missing, is the support for argument passing.
C_save should work ok. What exactly does happen?
cheers,
felix
On 8/14/07, Shawn W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I went to update my local copy of the darcs repository for chicken,
and it failed, looking like the URL for the repository is now some
wiki page. http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br/chicken is what I've been
pulling from. Did that change?
All development
On 8/11/07, Matthew Welland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why can't I use (load bar.scm), where bar.scm contains class definitions,
in a compiled block? I'm writing a cgi based web app (a chicken based,
primitive RoR) and I'd like to be able to compile most of my app but keep
parts of it definable
On 8/8/07, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The sandbox egg will be the only thing that gives a bit of security, but
it provides only a very basic Scheme dialect and is pretty slow.
The only (somewhat brute-forcish) solution that comes to mind is
to compile to a static executable
On 8/8/07, Tony Sidaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And so on.
It seems to me that I need to do this otherwise just about everything
in the namespace will be available at runtime, co-optable for bad
stuff.
Or am I just being a silly sausage? Is there a better way of doing this?
The sandbox
On 8/6/07, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The whole file is a bit long, but the neighborhood of line 55 is
pasted below. I am guessing the reason for the error message is the
fact that #define pyobject is after the function declaration?
___declare(type, pyobject;(c-pointer
On 8/6/07, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Splitting the #! did help, thanks. Also, if a C function returns
NULL, is the equivalent Scheme value #f, or is it a value that
satisfies the null-pointer? predicate? It seems like my null-pointer?
checks are complaining about bad argument
On 8/6/07, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
;; Parse embed
#!
___declare(type, pyobject;\PyObject\;py-object-to;py-object-from)
PyObject *PyObject_CallObject (PyObject *, PyObject *);
#
[...]
It compiles, but when I actually try to evaluate this:
On 8/6/07, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This results in an error message from the C compiler:
pyffi-support.c:55: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or
'__attribute__' before 'PyObject_CallObject'
Can you show me the relevant C code line, or even attach the whole compiled
file?
On 8/3/07, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
If I understand correctly, the easyffi extension translates types
of the form TYPE * as (pointer TYPE). Is there some way to specify
custom conversion procedures for a particular TYPE? For example, for
the following C function:
tcp timeouts are only available in newer chicken's (2.633 I think).
cheers,
felix
On 8/3/07, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/3/07, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/3/07, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to list all bound symbols, or even
Hello, folks!
Thanks to Mario, automatically built (daily) development snapshots are
now available:
http://chicken.wiki.br/dev-snapshots
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
On 8/1/07, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(bloody browser...)
(define foo
(letrec ((foo (extend-procedure
(lambda ()
(print I'm foo, my data is: (procedure-data foo)))
99)))
foo) )
cheers,
felix
*cough*
(define foo
(letrec ((foo (extend-procedure
(lambda ()
(print I'm foo, my data is: (procedure-data foo)))
99)))
foo) )
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users
On 8/1/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
felix winkelmann scripsit:
You could also use letrec to refer to the procedure itself from inside
the procedure.
I'm probably being thick, but I don't see how. Can you show an example
of this?
(define foo
(letrec ((foo (extend-procedure
True enough. That raise another question, though - can an egg be in
multiple categories?
Currently not.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
On 7/31/07, Ivan Shmakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
True enough. That raise another question, though - can an egg be in
multiple categories?
Currently not.
Any chance to get it working that way anytime soon?
The .meta file may hold
On 7/28/07, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I type (exit) into the telnet session, I get errors like this on
the server side:
Warning (#thread: thread6): : port already closed: #output port (tcp)
Call history:
eval (environment-copy
On 7/29/07, Ivan Raikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have further improved the wiki-texi converter, to the point
where it is able to produce a usable Chicken manual in Texinfo
format. I have created a ticket on trac.calcc.org that includes a
texinfo-related patch to stream-wiki,
On 7/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on a project where:
(1) I need the gc to be as close to real time as possible
(2) I would like to have multiple instances of embedeed scheme
interpreters (not being able to directly effect each other).
What is the easiest
On 7/25/07, Alaric Snell-Pym [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just out of interest, is anybody interested in cloth badges with a
lambda in parens?
http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/archives/2007/06/12/cloth-badges/
Sorry, not interested unless their is a chicken in there somewhere. :-)
cheers,
felix
On 7/26/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
felix winkelmann scripsit:
Just out of interest, is anybody interested in cloth badges with a
lambda in parens?
Sorry, not interested unless their is a chicken in there somewhere. :-)
Ah, but in the Lambda Order* the lambda is the essence
On 7/24/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
felix winkelmann scripsit:
What exactly do you mean with externally callable. Do you mean
that it should be possible to recognize procedures defined with
define-external? This shouldn't be too hard: the lolevel unit has
some functions
On 7/24/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IWBNI there were some way to examine a procedure object at runtime
to see if the procedure is externally callable. That would make
it possible to pass (certain) Scheme procedures safely to C code.
What exactly do you mean with externally
On 7/21/07, Robin Lee Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an app that uses a couple of C libraries. The general
problem I'm trying to solve is providing status updates to the user
in a timely fashion (ideally, about 750ms).
I've tried two approaches, both of which have failed:
1.
On 7/22/07, Thomas Christian Chust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, CHICKEN apparently doesn't support subsecond resolution
for file-select.
Indeed. Must fix that.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
On 7/17/07, Robin Lee Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I eventually found
http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br:8080//linking%20eggs%20statically
(which appears to be orphaned, by the way) and things are working
now.
So all is well?
cheers,
felix
___
On 7/18/07, Robin Lee Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 08:28:27AM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
On 7/17/07, Robin Lee Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I eventually found
http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br:8080//linking%20eggs%20statically
(which appears to be orphaned
On 7/15/07, Robin Lee Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got an app that is almost 1.0 ready. I've seen the page on
what C files you have to bundle to allow things to be compiled by
people that don't have Chicken, but what I'm unclear on is what you
have to do to allow people to run an app
A quick and dirty implementation of T's (http://mumble.net/~jar/tproject/)
object system is now available at:
http://chicken.wiki.br/operations
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
Hi!
Try passing -DWITHOUT_LIBFFI=TRUE to ccmake (or cmake).
I don't know why this fails.
cheers,
felix
On 7/13/07, Sunnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't compiled chicken for a while, but now I'm trying to compile
darcs head.
The first step is to run
ccmake .
, right? Well, it says
BTW, in ccmake you can simply press e and continue. It should still
be able to generate a makefile.
cheers,
felix
On 7/13/07, Sunnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't compiled chicken for a while, but now I'm trying to compile
darcs head.
The first step is to run
ccmake .
, right? Well,
On 7/11/07, Mark Voortman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I just ran into a problem with the openssl egg. If I run the code below
and browse to https://localhost/ it shows the certificate and everything,
but the page keeps loading. Only when I kill the server it actually shows
the page. My
On 7/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
What do negative call numbers in the output of chicken-profile mean?
Example:
procedure callsseconds average percent
...
g-compare 1657774727.0 4188.5200.000
On 7/11/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Cowan scripsit:
Excellent! Can you put it in the repository? Also, I think you should
consider using the unspecified object as Lua nil; conceptually they
are pretty much the same. That frees up symbols (as well as strings)
to be
Could you try the current darcs head? I have modfied the profiling
runtime code and chicken-profile to handle fixnum overlflow in this
case.
cheers,
felix
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
On 11 Jul 2007 12:01:30 -0300, Mario Domenech Goulart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A random thought: isn't it a buffering problem? In case it makes
sense, take a look at
http://chicken.wiki.br/Unit%20posix#set-buffering-mode!
I don't think so - closing the port should flush all remaining output.
On 7/7/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
felix winkelmann scripsit:
I have most of it working, where you thinking of something
particular? Or is evaluating Lua code enough?
I'd like to see. Why not publish it as an 0.1 egg?
Have a look at http://chicken.wiki.br/lua
cheers,
felix
On 7/10/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Christian Chust scripsit:
I have now changed the sqlite3 egg to represent NULL values as (void) on
the CHICKEN side. I have also made the necessary changes to the
sqlite3-tinyclos object relation mapper egg.
Excellent! It would be good
On 7/3/07, Arto Bendiken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps, then, we could use a form like (platforms ...) to indicate
that an egg will only build on some specific platforms. One would
probably like to refer to some existing build/package management
platform for a good standard set of symbolic
On 7/8/07, Martin DeMello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I want a C function whose body is a string generated by combining
a template and some arguments that fill in slots in the template.
(define-macro (foo name x)
`(define ,name
(foreign-lambda* void ((c-string arg))
,(format #f
On 09 Jul 2007 13:22:35 -0300, Mario Domenech Goulart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maybe it should be used only when the egg is platform-specific, since
we have only a few eggs in this situation. If (platform ...) is
ommited, it means that the egg is platform-independent. Otherwise, as
far as I
On 7/10/07, Martin DeMello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks! I was trying to use string-concatenate, but couldn't manage to
make it available at macro expansion time (is this possible?)
(require-for-syntax 'sfi-13)
cheers,
felix
___
On 7/4/07, foobar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
as the title allready suggests i'm looking for a way to return a list
from within
a c-function. I know how to return a list, but what i don't know is how
to fill
some of the elements with strings. More importantly how does the
On 7/6/07, foobar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great thanks. Just to be sure i've done it correctly.
Here is an example on how i would return a list of one string element.
(define return-a-list-with-string-elt
(foreign-primitive scheme-object ()
char str[] = \hallo\;
On 7/4/07, Robin Lee Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's SWIG?
A heavy duty version of easyffi: http://www.swig.org
I'm actually doing both CDK and libxmmsclient, and I don't need a
compelet wrapper for either of them; I just want things to work, and
I don't mind adding bits of CDK in
On 03 Jul 2007 21:50:54 -0300, Mario Domenech Goulart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem is that salmonella doesn't check .meta files contents and
.meta files are not part of .egg files.
Recently, the .meta files are also included in the eggs (automatically,
via egg-post-commit).
cheers,
felix
On 7/6/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Queiroz scripsit:
It's developed at the same university of one of my preferred
languages, Lua.
Hmmm. Chicken needs a Lua egg!
I have most of it working, where you thinking of something
particular? Or is evaluating Lua code enough?
On 7/6/07, Alex Queiroz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
On 7/5/07, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so, like, refresh my memory why people object to wxWidgets.
Because, you know, like, it seems a pretty obvious choice for
cross-platform GUI work. http://www.wxwidgets.org
Is
On 05 Jul 2007 23:22:10 -0300, Mario Domenech Goulart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 22:44:35 -0300 Bruno Deferrari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe the fmt combinator formatting library by Alex Shinn is what
you need: http://synthcode.com/scheme/fmt/
Also available as an egg:
801 - 900 of 1826 matches
Mail list logo
