Re: [Chicken-users] [s...@speechcode.com: More SRFI reviewers needed.]

Jeremy Steward scripsit: > Nonetheless, I noticed that the SRFI document mentions implementing > lazy sequences in a different way (utilizing SRFI 121: Generators, > which is also on your list). I was wondering if the lazy-seq egg has > been brought up whatsoever regarding this SRFI, and if

[Chicken-users] [s...@speechcode.com: More SRFI reviewers needed.]

- Forwarded message from "Arthur A. Gleckler" - Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 11:09:21 -0800 From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" To: srfi-annou...@srfi.schemers.org Subject: More SRFI reviewers needed. Happy new year, Scheme users and implementers! We need

Re: [Chicken-users] [s...@speechcode.com: More SRFI reviewers needed.]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | SRFI 127: Lazy Sequences Sorry as I do not have much to say towards the other SRFI's, as I am somewhat ignorant as to their process, however I noticed this one and could only think of the lazy-seq egg by Moritz Heidkamp