On Mar 23, 2009, at 10:46 PM, Alex Shinn wrote:
felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com writes:
It seems that one of the regexen's compiled in the definitions
for `absolute-pathname?' or `decompose-pathname' triggers
a loop in `nfa-join-transitions!' in the files.scm unit (these
are executed at
Kon Lovett wrote:
Alex Shinn wrote:
I'm also puzzled as to how this can be behaving differently between
Chicken 3 and 4 when the irregex.scm file is identical.
Me too.
I installed Ubuntu 8.10 x86_64 in a VMWare and tried compiling several
Chicken releases, but I couldn't reproduce the
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Kon Lovett klov...@pacbell.net wrote:
The chicken compiler uses Unit files.
Yes, exactly.
I'm also puzzled as to how this can be behaving differently
between Chicken 3 and 4 when the irregex.scm file is
identical.
It might be some glue code in regex.scm.
Taylor Venable wrote:
When building Chicken 3.4.7 and higher (up to 3.5.2) on Ubuntu 8.10
x86_64 the chicken compiler goes into an infinite recursion.
Excuse my ignorance, how do I check out a version such as 3.4.7 or
3.5.2? I cannot find the relevant tag or branch. Should I look for a
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:51:08AM +0100, Tobia Conforto wrote:
Taylor Venable wrote:
When building Chicken 3.4.7 and higher (up to 3.5.2) on Ubuntu 8.10
x86_64 the chicken compiler goes into an infinite recursion.
Excuse my ignorance, how do I check out a version such as 3.4.7 or
3.5.2?
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 08:48:50AM +0900, Ivan Raikov wrote:
I doubt this is the case, since the regex unit is almost identical
between Chicken 3 and Chicken 4. Taylor, can you compile Chicken with
the attached regex.scm and see if there is any routine from the regex
unit that is called at
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 08:48:50AM +0900, Ivan Raikov wrote:
I doubt this is the case, since the regex unit is almost identical
between Chicken 3 and Chicken 4. Taylor, can you compile Chicken with
the attached
felix winkelmann bunny...@gmail.com writes:
It seems that one of the regexen's compiled in the definitions
for `absolute-pathname?' or `decompose-pathname' triggers
a loop in `nfa-join-transitions!' in the files.scm unit (these
are executed at toplevel, outside of the scope of the associated
I doubt this is the case, since the regex unit is almost identical
between Chicken 3 and Chicken 4. Taylor, can you compile Chicken with
the attached regex.scm and see if there is any routine from the regex
unit that is called at the point when the build process gets stuck?
Thanks,
-Ivan
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:38:30AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
Could you try to build chicken 4? (possibly twice, building the compiler
with the compiler built from the bootstrap tarball - so that you are really
Hi!
I think you're right: these are two cases: the 10k stack is already too small
on a 64-bit machine and will continuously GC. The other case is the one
we're looking for. It may be that the irregex integration has a bug.
Could you try to build chicken 4? (possibly twice, building the compiler
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:38:30AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
Could you try to build chicken 4? (possibly twice, building the compiler
with the compiler built from the bootstrap tarball - so that you are really
testing the newest version and not some stale code in the bootstrapping
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:36:28PM -0400, Taylor Venable wrote:
Since regex.c seems heavily involved in this last case, I've also put
it on my website at: http://real.metasyntax.net:2357/tmp/regex.c.gz
Looking back at the changes log for the devel releases, I just noticed
that the first version
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:31:21PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net wrote:
Well I was able to trigger a hang in my build with the debugging
symbols by setting the nursery stack size to 10k. ?Debug log from GDB
is
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net wrote:
Usually when it hangs, I end up sending it ^C when it's inside mark().
So if I step out to C_reclaim() I can step through from line 2802 (or
sometimes 2805; in runtime.c) to line 3016. This I do in GDB using
the
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:09:41PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
Well done, Taylor. Chicken coalesces all allocations inside a single
generated C procedure and allocates it as one chunk. It seems here
that the stack is already too small to hold the data, even after a minor
GC was invoked. Can
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net wrote:
Well I was able to trigger a hang in my build with the debugging
symbols by setting the nursery stack size to 10k. Debug log from GDB
is attached. The three entries here were taken from allowing the
program to run
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:19:56PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net wrote:
The bug becomes more and more phantasmagorical!
When initially compiling chicken-boot with make PLATFORM=linux
DEBUGBUILD=yes bootstrap the bug
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net wrote:
The bug becomes more and more phantasmagorical!
When initially compiling chicken-boot with make PLATFORM=linux
DEBUGBUILD=yes bootstrap the bug does not appear.
When using -:d OR -:s500k OR -:s1m the bug does not
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 11:46:03PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net wrote:
I have no direct evidence that it was an infinite recursion. It was
just a guess by the symptoms, but admittedly I have little knowledge
of
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net wrote:
I have no direct evidence that it was an infinite recursion. It was
just a guess by the symptoms, but admittedly I have little knowledge
of Chicken's internals. Sorry for the noise on that. The symptoms
are that
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 01:45:10PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net wrote:
Hi all,
When building Chicken 3.4.7 and higher (up to 3.5.2) on Ubuntu 8.10
x86_64 the chicken compiler goes into an infinite recursion. ?CPU
Hi all,
When building Chicken 3.4.7 and higher (up to 3.5.2) on Ubuntu 8.10
x86_64 the chicken compiler goes into an infinite recursion. CPU
usage spikes, memory usage increases boundlessly, and no output is
ever produced. In Chicken 3.4.7 the file that when compiled triggers
this behaviour is
23 matches
Mail list logo
