Re: [Chicken-users] Is there interest in this Prolog interpreter packaged as an egg?

2016-02-21 Thread Jeronimo Pellegrini
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 09:28:38AM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote: > On 2016-02-21 15:21, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote: > > (compile -X r7rs -R r7rs -s -O2 "pll.scm" -unit pll) > > (compile -X r7rs -R r7rs -s -O2 "pll.import.scm" -unit pll) > > You shouldn't use "-unit pll" here. That's what's

Re: [Chicken-users] Is there interest in this Prolog interpreter packaged as an egg?

2016-02-21 Thread Evan Hanson
On 2016-02-21 15:21, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote: > (compile -X r7rs -R r7rs -s -O2 "pll.scm" -unit pll) > (compile -X r7rs -R r7rs -s -O2 "pll.import.scm" -unit pll) You shouldn't use "-unit pll" here. That's what's causing the error, and in this simple case where you're compiling a

Re: [Chicken-users] Is there interest in this Prolog interpreter packaged as an egg?

2016-02-21 Thread Jeronimo Pellegrini
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 07:55:49PM -0500, John Cowan wrote: > Jeronimo Pellegrini scripsit: > > > If you believe this would be interesting as an egg, tell me and I'll > > get it packaged! > > Nice! You should also compare it with Schelog. Definitely do package > it as an egg. Ok, I have done

Re: [Chicken-users] Is there interest in this Prolog interpreter packaged as an egg?

2016-02-20 Thread John Cowan
Jeronimo Pellegrini scripsit: > If you believe this would be interesting as an egg, tell me and I'll > get it packaged! Nice! You should also compare it with Schelog. Definitely do package it as an egg. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowanco...@ccil.org In the sciences,

[Chicken-users] Is there interest in this Prolog interpreter packaged as an egg?

2016-02-20 Thread Jeronimo Pellegrini
Hello, I have written a Prolog interpreter and I'd like to know if there is interest in its availability as an egg. http://aleph0.info/jp/software/prolog-in-scheme/ I am not sure if people will be interested, because it's really more a pedagogical tool -- the source code is part of a tutorial