On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:04:47AM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
Soulds really cool!
One question is why its backend is spiffy, and not http-server.
Is it possible to have an additional backend for http-server?
--daishi
You could certainly write one, but it would be a bit more work because
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 05:55:39PM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
I see. I didn't realize that part is used.
That said, you are using only a small part of Spiffy, right?
Yeah, currently I am. I'm not yet sure on how to proceed from here.
The amount of stuff used from Spiffy might grow, or it might
I see. I didn't realize that part is used.
That said, you are using only a small part of Spiffy, right?
I think I should use the Spiffy backend in any case, though.
--daishi
On 10/29/07, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:04:47AM +0900, Daishi Kato wrote:
Soulds
Soulds really cool!
One question is why its backend is spiffy, and not http-server.
Is it possible to have an additional backend for http-server?
--daishi
On 10/27/07, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I just made a new egg called web-unity. Its purpose is pretty simple:
it allows
Hi all,
I just made a new egg called web-unity. Its purpose is pretty simple:
it allows you to create web applications which can run via CGI, SCGI, FCGI
or Spiffy without having to change the code. All that's needed is a
server-specific dispatcher procedure which hands off the request to a
