On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Alan Post alanp...@sunflowerriver.org wrote:
I'm only going to get more demanding out of what I'd like match to
do, I would like the latest version.
I've updated matchable from the latest upstream,
which includes the fix.
--
Alex
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:52:15AM +0900, Alex Shinn wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Alan Post alanp...@sunflowerriver.org
wrote:
I'm only going to get more demanding out of what I'd like match to
do, I would like the latest version.
I've updated matchable from the latest
Fixed upstream, including http://synthcode.com/scheme/match-cond-expand.scm,
which is basically suitable for Chicken modulo the module syntax.
Do we want the latest version for Chicken (with tree patterns and ..1),
or should I just patch this one bug?
--
Alex
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 8:32 AM,
I'm only going to get more demanding out of what I'd like match to
do, I would like the latest version.
-Alan
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:17:19PM +0900, Alex Shinn wrote:
Fixed upstream, including http://synthcode.com/scheme/match-cond-expand.scm,
which is basically suitable for Chicken modulo
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Alan Post alanp...@sunflowerriver.org wrote:
I've just come across a bug in the matchable egg which I've
documented in ticket #487:
http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/487
A call is made to |length| even when the input isn't a list if a
production contains
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 07:51:12AM +0900, Alex Shinn wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Alan Post alanp...@sunflowerriver.org
wrote:
I've just come across a bug in the matchable egg which I've
documented in ticket #487:
http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/487
A call is made to
